Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
He looks scared...lolHave no idea.........maybe the locals ate 'em all????........Or--------maybe they all camera shy???.............lol..........
EDIT:..........Ooooops.....here's one........
View attachment 407261IMG_1303 by GEAUXtiger, on Flickr
Nice pics. Its amazing what the sea does to a wreck. I remember seeing pics of the ship when first sunk. The Kittiwake is on the same path. I remember diving the oro verde in GC in the 80s when fully intact. Now just scattered parts.
I count 15 in the second pic .A Fish!!! on the Tibbetts....Brac 3 -'17..
View attachment 407923IMG_1274 by GEAUXtiger, on Flickr
Make that 3 Fish!!!.....
View attachment 407924IMG_1287 by GEAUXtiger, on Flickr
I count 15 in the second pic .
BTW - My original comment was just questioning the seeming lack of significant amounts of fish versus what I would expect to see on an established wreck? The few wrecks I've dived dived so far have had much more life. For example, here is an unedited video from the Jane Sea wreck in Aruba - is the Tibbets typically like this or has something changed recently or over time (Lion fish impact, etc.,) - just curious...