I took the Cayman Aggressor in December 2005. It was just ok. The boat had been in dry dock for three weeks before we boarded Christmas Eve, Dec 24 2005. Christmas Day we made our first dive to 45 feet for a checkout of everyone's skills, etc. We got back on the boat and headed back into the dock where we were informed the air conditioning did not work and the plumbing was backing up. We stayed in port all day while they attempted to locate someone to fix the AC and get parts. We were told nothing all day of the status of repairs.
Either were we by you. I take it they fixed the A/C?
Get ready they are going to video everything and make you do stupid stuff and then sell it to you at the end.
Standard practice on many a liveaboard. But you certainly don't have to buy it.
We did not make the crossing to Cayman Brac or Little Cayman, blamed it on the seas, but it was smooth sailing the whole trip for us.
It's not the seas around Grand Cayman that they're concerned about when making the crossing.
Then charged us a $100 fuel surcharge for a boat that went no where!
This is definitely unwarranted, but for some reason it's also becoming standard practice. Don't think of it as a fuel surcharge, but a euphymism for "price increase".
They high tailed it back to the port so one of the crew could make it to the bank by 12 noon on Friday.
Again, it's standard for liveaboards to return to port on the second-to-last day and kick passengers off the boat for refueling, resupplying, maintenance, etc. Making it to the bank is probably another part of the weekly routine.
While we were all sitting at the hotel for the car service pickup on Sat morning we began to talk about the experience and realized they never washed the towels in between divers, only dried them. Nothing like wiping your face with a towel that someone blew their nose in after the last dive.
I never really paid attention to this until it was brought up on a Tahiti Aggressor trip I did a few years ago. I've since realized that a lot of boats are guilty of this, so I stopped blowing my nose in the towels.
I expected an upscale yacht type trip and got an expensive boat with a lot of problems. We all complained and received a $300 voucher for a future trip but I cancelled my plans for a Galapagos Aggressor trip that I would have taken this year.
Too bad about your CA experience, but you shouldn't have taken it out on the GA or even Aggressors in general. The Aggressors are franchised and the GA II was one of the best boats I have ever been on. The Turks & Caicos Aggressor was also nearly perfect. On the other hand, the Okeanos Aggressor (Cocos) was in miserable shape. The Tahiti Aggressor had a lot of minor glitches, though nothing major, and I've heard from people that went on it since that it was wonderful.
I've been thinking seriously about doing a Cayman liveaboard in the next year or two, but so far can't make up my mind between the Aggressor and the Nekton, especially since they're priced almost exactly the same (the Nekton is $50 cheaper on air, $50 more on nitrox). Normally I'd go with the Aggressor since they're usually a cut above the Nektons, it's $50 cheaper, and they include beer and wine, but I've heard a lot of mixed reviews about this particular boat and it's common knowledge that they make it to the sister islands less than half the time. I've already done a couple land trips to Grand Cayman and dove the north wall plenty, so I'd really be looking forward to visiting the other islands. I'm definitely leaning toward the Nekton.
Still, a lot of your complaints pertain to a lot of liveaboards, so you might not be cut out for boat travel on anything less than a cruise ship or the above-mentioned Four Seasons Explorer. My earlier liveaboard boat background was sharing bunkrooms with 20 other snoring divers, so I'm usually pleased with the luxury liveaboard amenities even when they're a bit flawed.