I think the explanation for Akimbo's more than additive effect of two bands, is that, if you watch how a tank slips out for a single band, it first twists sideways. That has a large lever arm on the band and stretches at with a huge mechanical advantage, and then it slips down. As it slips down and the band gets loose the tank twists more and finally slips out.
The second tank band not only adds extra friction but prevents the tank from twisting.
Adam
True, but our observations lead us to believe there is also a binding effect between the two bands. We ran a rope through an overhead pulley, tied to the harness, and jerked the rig up about 2' and let it drop 2'. The cylinder would slide a little on each cycle with a single loose band -- we estimated at the bottom of the drop. With two bands the cylinder would move more in relation to the BC at first and then nearly stop relative movement as if the bands were tightened. The closest analogy I can think of is the binding effect of a clove or rolling hitch compared to an overhand knot.
These "experiments" were not well controlled but interesting. Band tightness was "estimated equal" rather than measured. The surfaces were sprayed with a garden hose about the same. We didn't get too carried away studying the observation since there are so many other arguments justifying two bands.
I haven't looked that close at jacket BCs in years. Do most accept a second band as an option or with a simple modification?