Well, as one of the Cobalt’s original developers I could be considered biased
, but really they are both great choices, and both companies have stellar support. The Cobalt had teething problems with the case design early on, but those are behind us now. Shearwater is rock solid and run by great people. The Cobalt was designed and conceived as a computer for recreational divers, while Shearwater was first created for technical and rebreather diving. But I don’t think there is any reason to say that Shearwater’s computers are not also great recreational computers. The comments about Cobalt being more suitable for recreational diving probably refer to features like air integration and audible alerts that the Shearwater doesn’t have. For those eventually headed into technical diving these “recreational” features may be negatives. What matters to you is for you to decide.
Your principle choice is between a wrist mount or a console, and air integration or not. There are many strongly held opinions on both these subjects, and these threads often devolve into almost religious battles between partisans- to AI or not seems particularly contentious.
My take is that it comes down to personal preference and style of diving. Many divers prefer having their computer on their wrist, particularly if their hands are often occupied (photographers). Others of us do activities while diving (reaching back in holes…) that make having
anything on our wrists a bad idea. Personally, I have no problem checking a conveniently clipped off console, and I like having all of the information- decompression, compass, depth, pressure- in one location, visible at one glance or with a single motion, so I tend to prefer air integration over a separate SPG. I like single hose simplicity, and after 45 years diving I’m no longer doing any dives that would put me in peril if my single gas gauge flaked out. If I did do that kind of diving, I would definitely add a backup, whatever system I used. Air integration allows you to view data in your dive log showing your gas consumption rate (SCF/M) at any point in the dive or overall, which can be a learning tool. And it allows the computer to display a calculated gas time remaining at depth based on 1) your current breathing rate and 2) allowing enough gas for surfacing safely, which can be another useful bit of data in recreational diving. For many recreational dives, gas is a limiting factor, rather than NDL’s, air integration lets you see both- though it's
always a good idea to keep your own mental calculations going rather than relying solely on an instrument that can fail.
For other divers, particularly technical divers using multiple tanks, air integration starts to make less sense, or none at all. And experienced divers who dive a lot and plan their dives are likely to have a good sense of their gas consumption and much less need to check gauges than less experienced divers. For them, features like low gas alerts and rapid accent alarms are irritations, not positives, and gas time remaining calculations would be impossible to make meaningful.
One thing to look at with any computer is the user interface- is it easy for you to figure out without a manual. If, like many recreational divers, you dive infrequently, a user interface that is easy to operate may be worth a lot. I’ve seen divers go entire trips with a crippled computer when neither they or anyone else on the trip could figure out how to change settings. I think both Shearwater and Cobalt get high marks here.
I’m assuming that you have other dive gear sorted out? I always advise new or returning divers to pay most attention to gear where fit matters- suits for cold water, for instance. Dive computers are evolving rapidly, and there will always be something better coming down the road.
Good luck!
Ron