Yeah, but who is going to pay for that? The manufacturers won't as it's a lose-lose unless you have the best product in the market.Isn’t that the whole idea of third party?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Yeah, but who is going to pay for that? The manufacturers won't as it's a lose-lose unless you have the best product in the market.Isn’t that the whole idea of third party?
Like I said, pipe dreamYeah, but who is going to pay for that? The manufacturers won't as it's a lose-lose unless you have the best product in the market.
I think it's because many people these day get their information online and online is pretty much dominated by DIR/GUE people that never even used a crush neo but their philosophy tells them neos suck.There's a lot of love for neoprene dry suits in this thread. It's a bit surprising to me because I've yet to see one in real life here in Sweden, and I've probably met a hundred different dry-suit divers here.
I did not say that.neoprene IS warmer, crushed for no buoyancy shift, compressed for slight shift or uncompressed for the most warmth at the shallower end of the depths but as Berndo points out (perhaps others too) as you go deeper you will loose the suit insulation so the undergarments will have the load, if you have the right undergarment you’ll stay warm but you’ll have a lot of lead on you to get off of the surface.
I believe we said the same thing, my point is in R value all neoprene resists heat transfer better than trilam.I did not say that.
It's just not true, crush neos don't lose their insulation.
As I said, +30 years ago, neo drysuits were made from normal thick neopren that would compress like a normal wetsuit. Those sucked for the reason you mentioned. The whole point of crushed neo is so that the suit doesn't compress much further and doesn't lose insulation.