Thanks for all the pointers.
I went diving this weekend (twice! miracle of miracles). The reg was still very difficult to breathe from (no surprise there as I had not yet taken it in for a checkup). However, I did get an opportunity to "feel" the reg out better. The breathing effort was so bad on the second dive that I switched to my R190 octo. What a wonderful regulator! It is really wasted dangling from my BC. (At least I know that I would be donating my best performing regulator to a buddy in an OOA situation - in a totally non-DIR way, of course
). The downsides of the R190 are jaw fatigue and chin-bashing. But I digress.
Anyway, this mini-drama prompted me to pop into my LDS yesterday to get the problem sorted out. After a lot of to-ing and fro-ing, the tech found that:
a) One of the IP shims was not seated properly and had become "graunched" in the 1st stage. This was replaced - but was not the (only?) cause of the problem as my octo breathed just fine. He first thought there may be a problem with the 1st stage as the IP was too low. How this happened, I don't know - but anyway...
b) The diaphragm on the R380 had imperfections in the structure of the rubber. These looked like dimples and bumps on the surface. Not obvious unless you are looking for them. He replaced the diaphragm with a new one and the reg started breathing very nicely. Note that this was a shop test only. I will have to feed back on the performance in the water when I get a chance.
The 1st and second stages were then adjusted to get the optimal breathing effort from the regs. As he had contacted Scubapro about the issue while looking for the problem, the diaphragm was replaced free of charge(!).
My take on what was happening:
When a negative pressure was drawn behind the diaphragm (by me breathing in), the diaphragm was collapsing in a "non-symmetrical" way due to the blemishes in its structure. As a result, the lever was not being depressed smoothly through its stroke, resulting in varying levels of air being supplied during different stages of breathing. (This was particularly noticeable at low negative pressures (sucking softly) as the diaphragm had not moved much.) As a result, the breathing felt laboured at times, varying between bursts of air and very little air being delivered.
Any thoughts on this being a correct diagnosis of the problem? Is this known to be an issue, or am I clutching at straws? Apparently, SP have come across this before, hence the free swap-out.
Even if the point has been missed regarding the cause of the fault, the replacement of the diaphragm did lead to a
marked improvement in the breathing effort and smooth delivery of air through the breathing cycle. By smooth delivery I mean that by changing the amount I was sucking on the reg, the amount of air being delivered changed smoothly through the "normal" stroke of the lever. There were no points where very little to no air was being delivered, or where I got bursts of air (no "sputtering")
I hope that I have given an understandable synopsis of what I experienced with all these words.
Thanks for everyone's input. It is truly appreciated. The amount of knowledge and experience on this forum is amazing and it is wonderful to be able to tap into that resource.
Thanks for your willingness to help!
I must also retract my short, yet unkind, comments about the LDS and the service received there previously. A lot of effort was taken yesterday to find and resolve the problem. I had received less-than-optimal service in the past and expected this to continue. However, they really did a great job and deserve kudos for it.
Cheers,
Andrew