Ive heard, and seen posted in this forum, two divergent statements about Blue Holes geology. Either its a sinkhole, or its a volcanic throat. So I did some digging (on the internet, not at Blue Hole) and found this at:
NMBGMR Geologic Tour: Santa Rosa State Park
The Kelley citation can be found at:
http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/nmgs/guidebooks/23/NMGS_23.pdf
So Im pretty convinced that the statements about Blue Holes volcanic origin are incorrect. If they were right, we should see igneous rocks around, but all I ever see is sedimentary.
Anyone have contradictory evidence?
NMBGMR Geologic Tour: Santa Rosa State Park
Most of the natural lakes in the vicinity of the town of Santa Rosa are the result of solution phenomena that began during the Triassic and continue today. The town itself lies in a huge sink hole about 6 mi in diameter and 400 ft deep (Kelley, 1972b). Many of these karst depressions are nearly circular basins flanked by steep-sided cliffs of the Santa Rosa Formation (Sweeting, 1972). These features were formed by dissolution of underlying Permian limestone, gypsum, and evaporites of the San Andres Limestone and Artesia Group. Ground water dissolves these rocks, creating subsurface cavities. The overlying rocks, including the Santa Rosa Formation, collapse into the voids, creating surface depressions. The resulting fractures and faults bounding the sink holes provide conduits along which water can migrate. Water fills the surface depressions, forming lakes.
The Kelley citation can be found at:
http://geoinfo.nmt.edu/publications/nmgs/guidebooks/23/NMGS_23.pdf
So Im pretty convinced that the statements about Blue Holes volcanic origin are incorrect. If they were right, we should see igneous rocks around, but all I ever see is sedimentary.
Anyone have contradictory evidence?