Best CCR in 2025-2030 Rebreather Markets

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I believe a contributing factor is, that nonone understands the purpose of your question. Well yes you give your reasons, granted, but for most(all) others it does not make sense at all.

Maybe one can learn, maybe one help someone to overcome a misbelief, whatsoever. That is - at least speaking for me- the desire to understand more deeply the background, and with that I obviously speaking from something else than what you tell.
100 Prozent
This is how I saw most threads evolve, and a simple question turns into a treasure of new unknown unknowns being unveiled (to me) and much more value than the original question
 
nonone understands the purpose of your question.

Why do they need to? The OP asked a simple and precise question with one of three possible answers: Yes, No, or I don't know of any. One can elaborate with names if the answer is a "yes." That's all—no need for the hostility, pontification, and wise-arse answers.
 
Why do they need to? The OP asked a simple and precise question with one of three possible answers: Yes, No, or I don't know of any. One can elaborate with names if the answer is a "yes." That's all—no need for the hostility, pontification, and wise-arse answers.
That clear answer was in post#9; we are on #133 now
Between earlier and later the question was rephrased multiple times, while carrying extra false assumptions, statements and “speculations”

So we tried to get/give context for these extras 🤷🏽‍♀️
 
That clear answer was in post#9; we are on #133 now
Between earlier and later the question was rephrased multiple times, while carrying extra false assumptions, statements and “speculations”

So we tried to get/give context for these extras 🤷🏽‍♀️

Not exactly. I have been reading every single post here from the beginning; there may have been some answers, but none that were direct to the point. The answer, if you call it that, was drowned in the badgering and bullying occurring here. The OP is clearly a person who wants to hear from several sources and wants to do his due diligence (for whatever reason) in pursuing his research and getting the specific information he is seeking.

Why don't you guys lighten up, stop the badgering, answer the question posed here, and end the bullying?
 
Not exactly. I have been reading every single post here from the beginning; there may have been some answers, but none that were direct to the point. The answer, if you call it that, was drowned in the badgering and bullying occurring here. The OP is clearly a person who wants to hear from several sources and wants to do his due diligence (for whatever reason) in pursuing his research and getting the specific information he is seeking.

Why don't you guys lighten up, stop the badgering, answer the question posed here, and end the bullying?
Hopefully you learned something about rebreathers.
 
Why don't you guys lighten up, stop the badgering, answer the question posed here, and end the bullying?
True.. it is not easy to get a straight forward answers here. I felt at least 98% of responses posted here are off topic with unjustified online bullying.. but I am glad I learned some valuable stuff about the CCR ecosystem from the other 2% including information shared by @Mobulai @Wibble and many others.
 
Bullying? Have fun finding dive buddies with that attitude.

I am almost convinced that the OP is a bot. Unfortunately, the text is not long enough to complete a full analysis, but repetitive inquiries, monotonous sentences, and lack of personal touch across all threads and posts are good indicators. The fact that the author insists on raising the same question every year is odd, too. So either a bot or someone with serious issues.
 
I am almost convinced that the OP is a bot. Unfortunately, the text is not long enough to complete a full analysis, but repetitive inquiries, monotonous sentences, and lack of personal touch across all threads and posts are good indicators. The fact that the author insists on raising the same question every year is odd, too. So either a bot or someone with serious issues.

Feel free to call me 😅

There is nothing wrong with asking about public news catch up every year.. why would you or anyone think it's not normal?
 
Why do they need to? The OP asked a simple and precise question with one of three possible answers: Yes, No, or I don't know of any. One can elaborate with names if the answer is a "yes." That's all—no need for the hostility, pontification, and wise-arse answers.
Well people would like to help and answered basicslly with no, explained and also asked why its important.

I personally feel it very impolite to ignore this question and keep saying the same without any reference to an answer, which is relevant to the topic. Not even an "sorry I do not want to publicly say that", in contrast it was more you are not thinking right and I am the only one doing it right. Thats how I feel and read this hear. And this triggers questions and discussions.
 
Feel free to call me 😅

There is nothing wrong with asking about public news catch up every year.. why would you or anyone think it's not normal?

First, what exactly should we feel free to call you?

Second, it saddens me that anyone would believe its "normal" (whatever the hell that means these days) to get relevant news from any internet forum on any topic. When you can get a hundred quibbling posts on the virtues of snorkel holders, crotch straps, or different booties, your expectations should be pretty low.

Most "big" companies have marketing departments. Most have strategic plans. All have telephone numbers, most have email. A lot of them post in the Manufacturer's area here. Most are members of DEMA and go to the show. Last time I checked, you were allowed to speak with them directly.

You want to know about something that may happen in 5 years, ask a gypsy, get a crystal ball. Personally, I am betting on the 2.4% chance of a giant meteor impact in 2032. Lot better odds than the lottery.
 
Back
Top Bottom