LiteHedded
Contributor
I don't see that I've "attacked" GUE at all ... nor do I have any negative perceptions about them. I simply don't see them as "the best" as universally as some others do. That's a very relative term, and what I believe is that all choices come with both upsides and downsides ... and what may be "the best" choice for you won't be for some other people. All I've been trying to do is provide some balance by pointing out some of the potential downsides, as I see them. Seems to me that a lot of folks who choose that route are very good at criticizing the shortcomings of other agencies ... but can't handle much at all when someone attempts to point out the possible downsides of the choices they made.
Every coin has two sides ... before making a purchase, it pays to look at both of them ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
---------- Post added April 3rd, 2015 at 05:30 AM ----------
... perhaps it's a European thing, because all of the tech agencies I've trained with ... NAUI, TDI, IANTD, and NSS-CDS ... promoted pretty much the same rig. Even my sidemount class (IANTD) wanted me in a configuration that provided a long hose on one cylinder.
I'd think that any dive that has a potential for a restriction should mandate the long hose ... unless you've got a redundant air source that's separable from the diver that can be safely handed off in an OOA situation.
Curious ... if twinsets are going OUT of fashion, how do you guys provide redundancy?
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
everyone understands and can handle the downsides just fine dude. they wont teach me sidemount or solo diving. we all know that and are managing to handle it just fine
let it go. i'm sure your training was lovely