ScubaSteve
Wow.....what a DB
Guns are illegal on Bonaire, so security guards cannot carry guns.
Ya learn something new every day. Thanks for that tid-bit.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Guns are illegal on Bonaire, so security guards cannot carry guns.
I've read somewhere that Buddy's has guards at night. And BelMar has Butchie - or at least used to. He watches cars, gear lockers, patrols and helps people park at night. It's a really compressed property in a quiet area so probably all that's needed. He carries a knife, we used it to cut oranges open one night...
Or maybe it was limes...I could've been drinking that night.
Guns are illegal on Bonaire, so security guards cannot carry guns.
So I guess my point is that dismissing crime is foolish. It is a real deterrent to tourism and it costs the islands and people in the tourism industry real money. If there is a perception of higher than normal crime and appearance that nothing is being done about it, it hurts the tourism industry by forcing them to lower prices to attract visitors.
Uh, the island of about 14,000 has had 2 or 3 of murders in the last decade, one last year I think it was. Lower rate than the US, but not immune, but then neither is Cozumel - which I consider the safest island in the Caribbean, but had a quadruple hit last year.
Even if all burglaries that were committed with occupants asleep on premises were accomplished without personl injury, I still wouldn't consider that a safe situation. Exaggerations in discussions cause problems don't you think...?
I havent read through the entire post, but I do think crime and the perception of crime in Curacao and Bonaire are a problem. I spent a week in Curacao in January and had a great time. No theft, not problems. I would return. Actually I should say that I'd very much like to return for another vacation and I will recommend to friends.
However, the crime and petty theft is something that should be addressed. If nothing else, just some better PR by the tourism department would help. I debated booking our trip to Curacao because of it. Andreas and other SB members helped ease my concerns. But not everyone looking to go to these areas will seek further advice. They'll just read reports and figure, "well it's another Jamaica". Which is not the case.
The primary industry on Bonaire, and a major industry on Curacao is tourism. When a typical tourist (me) is booking a vacation they do take the crime into account. And the reality is that, whether it's perception or reality, areas with higher crime make less money. If Curacao had zero crime and Bonaire had some crime, Curacao would be able to charge more for rooms, diving, food etc. $200 a week for every room on the island is real money. And in my opinion that's easily within the range I'd would be willing to pay.
There may be just as much crime in the Caymans, but you don't hear about it and they capitalize on the perception of safety. It's the same reason you can go to Jamaica or the Dominican Republic for half the price. I've been to both and will not return to either. I didn't have problems in either place, but you'd be crazy to leave a car on a beach unprotected in either country, because they'd probably steal the car its self. In Jamaica I'd be very careful just going to a beach alone. They are a night and day difference from Curacao. Before visiting however, I questioned whether Curacao would be similar. And to some degree that was what I expected to find.
So I guess my point is that dismissing crime is foolish. It is a real deterrent to tourism and it costs the islands and people in the tourism industry real money. If there is a perception of higher than normal crime and appearance that nothing is being done about it, it hurts the tourism industry by forcing them to lower prices to attract visitors. There must be a balance between money spent for security and what that money returns in higher tourism. Ultimately from my perspective if either island made a security push with results the could compete against the other on that issue and increase revenue enough to cover the costs of the security.
This is great in theory. When the parent government is 6,000 miles away... the theory begins to fall apartUsually the way it works is when tourism is a countries major GNP, the infrastructure of the island functions as a result of the taxes levied on tourism directly and the fees and taxes levied indirectly on the islands population who gain their income directly from tourism.
When tourism declines the local governments coffers get reduced directly from the direct taxes and indirectly from the indirect taxes and fees on the the locals who stop spending money they don't have. Infrastructure begins to suffer, services begin to be cut. The locals cry out and demand the government does something. The government analyzes the problem and determines tourist visits are down and they must do something about it. They finally figure out it's a perception issue, in this case it's a perception of crime and safety. They finally work to alleviate the crime issue, they may then spend money on marketing the island to get over the bad image and try to return the island visits to normal.
The path to the resolution can come quicker if the local businesses band together and approach their government to inform them of the problem and make them aware of it and demand change so it never has to get as bad as it will.