Maybe it is overthinking and I too wonder what can possibly happen to the BC to cause total failure. However, I think the purpose of the example given in class is to get the student thinking about weighting and understanding the balanced rig concept. A lot of students are taking Fundamentals after taking OW or maybe AOW and weren't exposed to the information. I know I wasn't. However, what I did learn from AOW was that I wanted/needed more training and Fundamentals was my choice.
As to the example, it got me asking myself questions about weighting and what it means to dive a balanced rig considering the two extremes; 1: Divers should be able to hold a stop with nearly empty tanks and 2: Divers should be able to surface with a failed wing.
Below are some of the questions and observations I got out of the example. I bet the OP had some of the same observations based on the posting of the thread. If I am wrong let me know.
Is this a balanced rig? Why or why not? No. Although it meets extreme 1, being able to hold a stop with nearly empty tanks, it doesn't meet extreme 2, being able to surface with a failed wing. The diver is 22 pounds negative at 100 feet and the baseline weight that a diver can comfortably swim up to the surface is 10 pounds so the diver is overweight by 12 pounds for extreme 2.
Is this a balanced rig if the diver dropped the weight belt? Why or why not? No. If the diver dropped the 12 pound weight belt it brings them down to negative 10 pounds and they can comfortably surface so now extreme 2 is fulfilled; however, extreme 1 would not. At 10 feet the diver would be underweight by at least 6 pounds and maybe more depending on how much gas was used to ascend.
Is this a balanced rig if the diver had ditch-able weights equal to the weight of the gas in the tank? Why or why not? No. If the diver just ditched the weight of the gas they would be good to go for extreme 1 but would not fulfill extreme 2. The diver would drop 6 of the 12 pounds carried but would now be negative 16 pounds or 6 pounds over the 10 pound weight standard.
I realized that just doing a weight check at the end of a dive with an empty wing and near empty tanks may be insufficient since it doesn't take into consideration the beginning of the dive (extreme 2).
I learned from this thread options alternatives for a diver to surface with an unbalanced rig from old school shopping bags, better finning skills, DSMBs, bigger lung capacity, better fitness etc.
I realized why a drysuit would be preferred over a heavy wetsuit.
I realized that is impossible to balance the rig in the example. However, I think that was the intention so that I or any student would think about weighting in a wholistic manner. To really think about everything so one is properly weighted and not overweighted like many divers coming out of OW and AOW.
Maybe it is overthinking but I feel the example and the observations that come from it has made me a safer diver.
Now can we get back to talking about pee valves?