Yes, Edmonds is a great place to challenge yourself with skills if you stick to the shallows . . . of course, by some standards, it's ALL shallow.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
lamont:Well, you can still do this safely. The way to do it though is not to yo-yo. Go do a dive around the park, then shoot a bag and surface with a slow ascent. Then drop and ascend up the contour where you'll probably do 15+ minutes of deco going from ~20-35 up to 5-10... That's more than enough time for any possible free-phase badness caused by surfacing would be compressed and filtered through the lungs and then the pressure would come off gradually...
What wouldn't be as good would be to go on a dive and then come back and start yo-yoing up and down with multiple attempts to shoot the bag and do ascent drills... Still at EUP with EAN32, this wouldn't be guaranteed to get you hurt (OW SI often do this with CESA drills with their students and only very occasionally do they get bent) but its something to avoid...
And I've done skills dives at EUP where we only went down to around 10-15 fsw and filmed ourselves doing backkicks and bag shooting and stuff (and on this contour if you get blown south you'll wind up hitting the dock, which may get you a ticket, but you won't get tangled up with ferry props). I think we did this first, and then for the second dive went on a fun dive. The good thing about doing the skills dive at EUP was that we had tons of ambient to film ourselves, and the 10 foot depth mades all the buoyancy skills actually harder.
Actually I should have some short film clips of me from that session at EUP that I could put up on my website again...
dsteding:even those instructors practicing CESAs sorta freak me out
SparticleBrane:Just curious--why? I'm of the understanding that you can be that deep for an essentially infinite amount of time, immediately surface, and be fine. Thus if someone were on scuba for ~10 minutes and then did a CESA from 15ft, it's highly unlikely (however, possible) that they'd get DCS...even if they did it multiple times.
edit: I'm not advocating this, of course...just going about it hypothetically.
SparticleBrane:Just curious--why? I'm of the understanding that you can be that deep for an essentially infinite amount of time, immediately surface, and be fine. Thus if someone were on scuba for ~10 minutes and then did a CESA from 15ft, it's highly unlikely (however, possible) that they'd get DCS...even if they did it multiple times.
edit: I'm not advocating this, of course...just going about it hypothetically.
TSandM:You know, at bottom it comes down to a risk-benefit ratio. Is there a lot of risk from doing an ascent and subsequent descent at Edmonds? No. Is it avoidable? Yes. I think it would be considered DIR to avoid avoidable risk.
dsteding:Yup, agreed.
Lamont-nice mental image regarding the soda bottle.
There's a reason why we do the CESAs at the beginning of the day's first dive ... the soda's still flat ...lamont:I don't know that we've really got valid physiological models of what happens we we yo-yo really badly like an OWSI doing CESAs all day with a huge class...
I just get mental images of a soda bottle being shook up...