There may not be data to differentiate risk levels posed by following different deco algorithms, but some of us may get peace of mind by following what's widely considered a "conservative" algorithm or plan. Perhaps it's a false sense of security, but it makes me feel better, more relaxed, and I suppose that has some value. My goal is to enjoy my diving, and I enjoy it less when I start wondering whether I might be pushing the envelope.
It's pretty clear Craig understands risk. Some of us have low risk tolerance, and others have high risk tolerance. I don't think many of us would go so far as to berate another diver who clearly understands the level of risk implicated by his diving practices. I think the concern that some of us have is not for people like Craig but for divers who don't fully appreciate the relationship between their diving practices and level of risk.
Anyway, I didn't mean to jump into a general discussion about risk tolerance or violating no-deco limits, as my post was directed solely to RickyB's anecdote.
It's pretty clear Craig understands risk. Some of us have low risk tolerance, and others have high risk tolerance. I don't think many of us would go so far as to berate another diver who clearly understands the level of risk implicated by his diving practices. I think the concern that some of us have is not for people like Craig but for divers who don't fully appreciate the relationship between their diving practices and level of risk.
Anyway, I didn't mean to jump into a general discussion about risk tolerance or violating no-deco limits, as my post was directed solely to RickyB's anecdote.