Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
I can show your dozens of threads where the diver was found dead with weights on. Ditching is taught but too often forgotten in the time of need. I've thought of it when dealing with challenges on the surface but did not at depth until KenK and I discussed that recently. My home bud & I drill on it the first dive of any trip now, be it a practice dive trip in New Mexico or a real trip.:focus:
[Speculation:] So far, we seem to have two instances where divers died in scenarios where they could have ditched their gear. [/Speculation]
Are students not taught gear-ditching anymore?
He is listed as the primary Inst: who we are
Not saying this had anything to do with the accident, but one of my biggest complaints with the way most scuba divers are taught is that there is way more emphasis on what to do when you run out of air than there is on how to not run out of air in the first place.
Logic would dictate that the best way to deal with any accident is to prevent it from happening.
Whatever the water temperature, one of the major weaknesses of how AOW is currently taught is that the students often go into the class ill prepared/equipped for those environments. The fact that AOW is often sold as "five more dives with an instructor" should be your first clue ... if you go into it feeling like you need supervision after OW class, then you are not prepared to take on more challenging dives in new environments. You would be better off hiring a DM or finding a mentor to take you diving in the environment in which you trained until you get comfortable with the skills you were supposed to have learned in OW. This is the most significant reason why so many people come out of AOW feeling like they didn't learn anything ... because, frankly, they weren't in a position to learn. All of their mental and physical bandwidth went into hanging on for dear life while they "survived" the AOW dives.
And you're right ... it's a recipe for disaster. That sort of "training" is just setting people up for an accident ... if not in the class itself, then shortly thereafter ... when they go off feeling like they're now somehow ready for deeper dives or more challenging conditions.
Folks need to slow down and remember that the whole point of scuba diving is to have fun ... dying isn't fun ...
... Bob (Grateful Diver)
It depends, Jax ... many of my classes are one on one ... at worst it's two on one. You teach to conditions ... if conditions are very low vis, then a small instructor-student ratio is better. If the shop can manage that sort of ratio, then good on them.Thank you. And remember, Mark had already stated it was heresay.
So, you are saying (above) that in your experience, there is a staff member assigned to every student? Is that normal for that lake or area? Of just for that dive shop?
As far as them "not being separated from the group" since you assume his buddy was a staff member ... why not? Isn't navigation one of the AOW skills? There are perfectly good reasons for them to not be with the group.
I find that one to one staff ratio mind-boggling. That is an extremely high overhead for a business.
all students diving in alberta are in 2 piece 7mm which work out to 14 mm on your core they are also give hoods and gloves
all students diving in alberta are in 2 piece 7mm which work out to 14 mm on your core they are also give hoods and gloves