seaducer
Contributor
And what does it accomplish to introduce students to new experiences when they're not yet comfortable with the experiences they got from their OW class?
Sorry, but I have real issues with that approach.
First off, if so many people are coming out of AOW stating (as they do repeatedly on ScubaBoard) that they didn't get anything out of their AOW class, why isn't that a red flag to the agencies that maybe they should take a closer look at how the class is being taught ... rather than simply how it's being marketed?
How many of those divers were new though? I know some people who took AOW just because an op required it, had been diving for years and learned nothing. But that is the dive op's fault, not the agencies. Personally, as a new OW diver, I learned a ton in my AOW class.
Second, all of the agencies require a deep dive as part of their AOW (or whatever they choose to call the post-OW con-ed) class. How can they justify taking a student who isn't even comfortable with the basics of buoyancy control to 100 feet? Or certifying them to dive to that depth after only a single "experience" dive where they didn't even bother to teach them anything about how to prepare for a deep dive?
I don't know, I remember there was a bit more information and theory on pressure, narcosis, dive planning etc. in my AOW as opposed to OW. This was 10+ years ago, it may have changed. Was I competent to lead a dive then? No way, but I think I had enough knowledge at that point to understand what I was getting into, and take part in deeper dives with more experienced buddies. Bouyancy was an eye opener, and I am glad the first time I went deep with a 7mm suit I had an instructor I trusted there with me, the compression made bouyancy and trim a challenge at depth, much more so than diving the same suit in 15-25 feet which was where my dives had been to that point.
Based on your comments above, it sounds like the objective of AOW isn't to actually teach the student anything ... it's to use AOW as a means to sell more specialty classes. I have a real problem with that ... in my neck of the water, that's a great way to set a new diver up with a false sense of security that can land them in a really bad situation ... because at the end of the class you're handing them a card that says they're qualified to go do those dives they just "experienced". To my concern, before they get that card, they should have adequate knowledge and skills to go do those dives safely.
Again, it may have changed, but I felt pretty comfortable taking part in deeper dives, or navigating, or helping search or recover something from the bottom after AOW. Again, I wasn't prepared to lead the planning or activities, but I was ready to take part, and I understood the risks and skills much more than I did after OW.
I was comfortable doing shallow daylight dives in good vis ( in NJ that means 10 feet)Well, based on some of the previous replies in this thread it sounds like a lot of people didn't feel qualified to dive on their own after OW class. How many other "divers" come out of those classes without such a well-developed sense of survival ... despite a C-card that allows them to acquire the gear and take the trips?
However, I had never been deeper than 40 feet and was concerned about narcosis. I had never been on a wreck and was concerned about entanglement hazards. I had never been on a boat dive and was concerned about ettiquete and procedures. I had never dove at night and the thought made me nervous. While I had EXTENSIVE navigation experience in the Army, doing so U/W was foriegn to me.
AOW was a perfect fit for me. I am a bit adventurous though. I do agree that if you are feeling like you NEED an instructor just to feel safe diving, you should not throw the challenges of AOW into the mix. Hire a DM and get some confidence first.
FWIW I am not sure I can blame an instructor for passing someone who feels like they need to be guided on their first few dives. Lots of people are just very cautious about new things, and not comfortable striking out on their own at first, or maybe even ever. If they pass the tests and skills with proficiency is the instructor supposed to read their minds?
That personality is the product of the "bicycle helmet generation", and is probably the subject of another thread. Suffice to say alot of people's idea of adventure is watching Bear Grylls without commercials...