In my experience, "everybody looks out for everyone else" equals "nobody is looking out for anyone else". I'm new to diving (obviously). It frightens me to think that there wouldn't be a person assigned as my buddy who has an interest in my welfare.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
In my experience, "everybody looks out for everyone else" equals "nobody is looking out for anyone else". I'm new to diving (obviously). It frightens me to think that there wouldn't be a person assigned as my buddy who has an interest in my welfare.
I understand. When I had a home dive buddy, we took it seriously. I reminded him to take actions early to clear his ears before we got to the dock, we did our BWRAF checks, we entered together, descended together, stopped at 15 feet together until he cleared his ears, descended together, stayed together, ascended together, safety-stopped together, surfaced together, and left the water together as possible - much of this after realizing the problems when we didn't earlier on. I wouldn't expect an insta-buddy to put up with all of that, nor could I trust one. If I assigned one, I want to know how to release his weights at least and for him to know that my pony is always open and ready to grab, but I'd rather not have the responsibility.In my experience, "everybody looks out for everyone else" equals "nobody is looking out for anyone else". I'm new to diving (obviously). It frightens me to think that there wouldn't be a person assigned as my buddy who has an interest in my welfare.
Nope. I'd never ask anyone to do that. Why do these conversations always have to revert to "risking one's life"? Seems to me that if a buddy did nothing else but stay close and "keep track" of the other guy, then many of these incidents wouldn't spiral out of control. Go ahead and call me the naive new guy, but if I'm assigned a buddy, I've got his back. Not sure I could handle the guilt of someone dying because I was negligent.Do you really think that an instabuddy is going to put themselves at risk to save you?
Nope. I'd never ask anyone to do that. Why do these conversations always have to revert to "risking one's life". Seems to me that if a buddy did nothing else but stay close and "keep track" of the other guy, then many of these incidents wouldn't spiral out of control. Go ahead and call me the naive new guy, but if I'm assigned a buddy, I've got his back. Not sure I could handle the guilt of someone dying because I was negligent.
Yes and no. It's a difficult question to decide in an instant. Forethought may helpIt’s a question that needs to be asked. Are you willing to risk a bad DCS hit trying to save someone you don’t know? I’m not, and I generally don’t have many instabuddies. Better one victim than two. You’ll learn that in your Rescue class.
It’s a question that needs to be asked. Are you willing to risk a bad DCS hit trying to save someone you don’t know? I’m not, and I generally don’t have many instabuddies. Better one victim than two. You’ll learn that in your Rescue class.
I have no idea how I'll react in an emergency, but I hope that I wouldn't have a predisposition to do nothing, Do you tell potential dive buddies beforehand that if they get into serious trouble they're SOL? Serious question. To be fair to them, you should. I mean maybe it would encourage them not to wander away.It’s a question that needs to be asked. Are you willing to risk a bad DCS hit trying to save someone you don’t know? I’m not, and I generally don’t have many instabuddies. Better one victim than two. You’ll learn that in your Rescue class.