sea_otter
Contributor
I realize that I wasn't using AL's and comparing to steel tanks, but I think it was a reasonable test of the theory that adding more weight relative to added buoyancy gives a constant result. It didn't seem that way to me.
Did that make sense? I'm not at my clearest tonight...
That makes perfect sense. When you were diving with 22 lbs of weight (yikes!), you had to add a lot of air to your BCD to compensate. Weight may be constant, but air sure isn't. If you ascend even a few feet, that big bubble is going to expand, and it'll pull you up. By contrast, if you're closer to proper weighting, the bubble in your BCD will be smaller, so you'll easily be able to balance out with a simple exhalation.
Get to a point where you're neutral with zero gas in your BCD at 10 ft deep and 500 psi in your tank. That's the appropriate amount of lead, and proper weighting provides better buoyancy control the whole dive through.
As for aluminum vs steel, you should be able to get either one properly weighted, though the aluminum one will likely take an extra block of lead, meaning the whole rig will be slightly heavier on land. This becomes an issue if your exposure protection is so thin that with a steel tank and zero lead, you're still too heavy. Otherwise, either work.
The best thing about AL80s is the price tag. They're cheap. Between the steels, for single tank diving, if the price is the same I'd choose HP100s. I might be swayed to LP85s if the shop could reliably overfill them to 3000, or if I was going doubles (the 85s are a little bit longer and lighter which makes them trim very well as a set). Even if you're not likely to breathe it yourself, more gas is always nice to have.