VooDooGasMan
Contributor
wart there is actually more than you think, back long ago most had a commercial 02 in the boat and the regs were at 20' waiting for you, diving deep air deco dives.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
wart there is actually more than you think, back long ago most had a commercial 02 in the boat and the regs were at 20' waiting for you, diving deep air deco dives.
wart there is actually more than you think, back long ago most had a commercial 02 in the boat and the regs were at 20' waiting for you, diving deep air deco dives.
It's a moot point. No one can prove it's more narcotic, in theory (overton -meyer?) it looks twice as narcotic as Nitrogen. But it's apples & oranges, one is an inert gas the other metabolised. Can the 2 really be compared?
I mean there's a fair few of us that have deco'd on pure O2 at 6m (pp 1.6) anyone significantly off their chops during their deco?
I mean there's a fair few of us that have deco'd on pure O2 at 6m (pp 1.6) anyone significantly off their chops during their deco?
Absolutely! You carry all your gas with you, including enough back gas to deco out on it should you lose your deco gas and/or a second deco gas. Somekind of contingency. The boat has gas is not an acceptable option.I assume you are talking about "safety measures"....In south florida, this was not the practice by thinking divers...in a technical depth drift dive, you can never assume or expect the boat to be overhead when you surface, even if you are towing a float--which few divers want to do for tech level depths, due to excessive drag.
You had/have to have everything with you that you would need till you climb out of the water...if you wanted 100% O2, it would have to be clipped on.
Maybe on a baby tech dive in Cayman down a line, and back up it, you could expect a hanging tank to be there at 20 feet....but this is NOT the case for real tech dives in south florida.
In 1985, Dr. Fowler (with Drs. Ackles and Porlier from DCIEM) published a review paper in "Undersea Biomedical Research" critically evaluating the research that had been conducted on the effects of inert gas narcosis on behavior. They concluded, "The evidence concerning the effects of hyperbaric oxygen on performance and its relationship to narcosis is too contradictory to draw any conclusions". In plain English, this means that the research up to 1985 did NOT support a conclusion that oxygen was narcotic nor even that it potentiated nitrogen narcosis.