Accident at Lake Rawlings Sunday 05/27/2012

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Wow. Thanks for making the connection. This is one dive shop I'd stay away from.
 
not appropriate for what? an online discussion board, marketing material for the shop...I don't believe in coincidences, tooth fairies or wishful thinking.
 
not appropriate for what? an online discussion board, marketing material for the shop...I don't believe in coincidences, tooth fairies or wishful thinking.

We do not yet know all or even many of the facts about Sunday's events. I read the disgruntled post you reference, and certain of his statements are factually wrong (I have dived Rawlings). I have also worked with many Splash current and past instructors and DMs, though not with the owners. The people I have worked with there are some of the best I know.
 
The people I have worked with there are some of the best I know.
Well like you said, you haven't worked with the owners, and that's what this is about, not the staff, past, present, or future.
 
I just re-read the whole thread and can't find nor make the connection you're asserting came from me.
 
Sorry, my bad. What I meant was that I was responding to a post regarding the dive center and not specifically about the owners.
 
Staff, owners, DM's etc do not matter. What matters is an ow student was lost and died on a training dive. That should never happen. That it did is unforgiveable. Barring a previously unknown medical condition there is no reasonable excuse any instructor could make for this occurring. I go back to my previous post concerning the conditions and the schedule described for training students. Not enough time to insure comfort in the water under those conditions for many new divers. I would like to know how much time was actually spent going over and actually reinforcing proper buddy procedures during training. What was the procedure followed during checkouts? Were the divers paired up in proper position or were they being led single file when she went missing? Were they actually on the platform, around it, or swimming looking for this "artifact" (I'm guessing feature would be a better word)? And was the instructor able to see all of the divers at once at any time, since if not he was not he was therefore not in direct supervision?
Sent from my DROID X2 using Tapatalk 2
 
Jim, I understand your point of view, but think you may be seeing with tunnel vision.
Even if I have only 2 students, there are times( touring dives) that I am not going to be in direct eye contact with my students. Being the instructor, I lead the dive. I can't navigate the quarry without taking my eyes off the students for a minute....or more like 10 seconds, which is plenty of time for this incident to happen, I've been refraining from bringing this up, but how is it that her husband/dive buddy didn't even know what happens to her, and was most likely the closest person to her. From what I read in the earlier reports she still had air, so quite frankly it seems that this was a medical problem that just so happened to occur under this instructors watch. Could have very well happened in the parking lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm asking questions that need to be answered in light of this incident. I would definitely blame myself if something like this were to occur. Direct eye contact is not necessary but being able to see the students is.

Around here we are lucky to have 20 feet of vis. 10-15 is often more the case. So rather than lead by staying ahead of students I will be beside them, over them, or sometimes behind them. Navigating the quarry, lake, etc is not just my task but the students as well. My policy is no more than two students at a time on the first two dives.

Now granted I keep my classes small, but it can be done and still get 6 divers a day through on the first dives. Means a lot of bottom time for me but more than doable. As a DM I more than once did 8 dives a day.

When doing this I take two students who are always in proper buddy position. Ie no more than a 1/4 turn of the head to see each other. Poor vis and then touch contact is used. Depending on conditions, and how they do day one, I decide if the group can go together on 3 and 4 the next day. If they can then we do. But if there is any question I might lose sight of all of them we do the buddy pair per dive only. Or I make sure I have an assistant. Last time I had 4 OW students on a dive at the same time I had an assistant and two other highly experienced divers tagging along watching over their kids and one guys wife who was diving with her dad. We adjusted the pace to keep the group together and I had the students lead the dives after giving them instructions on where to go. This allowed me to move around all of them and not lose sight of any of them.

And like you I want to know where her buddy was. And was he even aware of what he was supposed to do as a buddy? This is perhaps the most distressing thing. I cannot think of a worse feeling or realization. And if he was not aware of what was happening why not? I looked at this in the presentation I developed on the "Failure of the Buddy System" that I worked on after the rather spectacular thread about the death in Grand Cayman back in 09. In that case and in the fatailites that I looked at for the article it came down to one glaring fact.

The buddy system works!

IF people are taught how to use it. Among new divers that was the overwhelming thing that came out. Though the system was talked about in the classes it was never really put into practice. Students were not paired up and made responsible for each other. They did not have sufficient time to practice it. And by removing rescue skills from the OW class and not looking at how quickly this activity can kill, the real value of the buddy system was not driven home. Then students were led around on tours single file further eroding the lesson of the buddy system. It was just like saying "this is what you should do but we are not going to so that shows you how important it is."

So where is the lesson? And what is it? This is why I buddy students up from day one. Before they even get on scuba it is explained that at no time do you leave or lose sight of your buddy. During the swim tests they are required to stay together. No racing. When treading I like them within reach of each other just to reinforce the lesson. When doing skills they do them one at a time but the buddy stays within reach. Doing air shares I want the buddy next to them with their octo ready to hand off. By the third or fourth session they do not even have to be told where to be. They just move there. They help each other with gear, are constantly comparing gauges, giving the ok sign, and developing the situational awareness they will need in Open Water.

I can't do this overnight in a quickie course. People say students are too busy worrying about themselves to really keep an eye on their buddy during checkouts. If this is true then they are not ready to be on these dives. IF they are that nervous and apprhensive that they cannot maintain good buddy procedures then they should not be doing the dives. It's just a parroting back of the bare minimums and hoping to come out alive.

It's why SEI has a 12 - 16 hour minimum for pool training standard. With the higher end being strongly recommended. And why we still teach rescue skills. To ingrain the lessons and make sure that the student understands the importance of them. It has a chance to sink in. A 4 - 6 hour pool course is not sufficient for that to happen with many people in my experience and based on what I see at the dive sites I have been to. Oh they get through the skills but do they understand them and more importantly will they retain them a month later?
 

Back
Top Bottom