A warning to Wyndham customers, especially re the Aura section

[ggunn]

Until this hit the TA forum I didn't know anything about "lifestyles" either but you do seem to have a pretty good start at understanding the term. Isn't the language of advertising wonderful?

Well, I try to maintain a laissez-faire attitude toward other folks' foibles; I certainly don't want any outside interference with mine. I appreciate the heads-up, though; I don't want my family anywhere near it.

 

[cicopo]

I'm not trying to tell anyone how to live either, but considering just how drastic a policy change this is it needs to be pointed out for several reasons. Firstly the original ads for the Aura are still all over the web touting it as a high end luxury resort, and they don't of course mention the new clothing optional policies or what that might lead to in the areas where it is allowed. (it is listed as an adult only resort but 13 is adult age in Mexico). Anyone looking at the original ads could easily think it would be a great resort to stay at. Suppose they were involved with kids in something like coaching or a scout troop and the community found out that they were going to a "lifestyles" resort, (which they were not aware of). That could easily get them into big trouble in their own community.
Another issue of course relates to the fact places like this are usually away from conventional resorts, not right in the middle of them.
And my final thought re the sudden change in policy relates to how they are treating those who pre booked & paid before the change was announced (extracted as a result of forum messages is a more accurate way to say it). People who no longer want to stay there are not being offered refunds nor help with an alternative hotel, just a room upgrade from the messages I have read so far. I don't think that is a reasonable approach since they will be very uncomfortable with the place.

 

[Mawg]

Well, I try to maintain a laissez-faire attitude toward other folks' foibles; I certainly don't want any outside interference with mine. I appreciate the heads-up, though; I don't want my family anywhere near it.

I agree that communal nudity is not all that it is cracked up to be, no matter how rosy a picture they may paint. But, think of the convenience it affords one at breakfast.You can carry a pitcher of orange juice in one hand , a pot of coffee in the other and still bring 3 doughnuts and two bagels to the table.

 

[ggunn]

I agree that communal nudity is not all that it is cracked up to be, no matter how rosy a picture they may paint. But, think of the convenience it affords one at breakfast.You can carry a pitcher of orange juice in one hand , a pot of coffee in the other and still bring 3 doughnuts and two bagels to the table.

Only 3 doughnuts and two bagels? Gee, that's too bad... ;^)

I have no desire to carry a pot of hot coffee whilst pantsless.

 

[christygobar]

/de-lurk/

So do we know what this means for Sabor? They are still listed on a couple of these "Lifestyles" websites and I know it was briefly mentioned at the beginning of this thread.

I have some time before I go there in July, but hopefully if it comes out that they will be advertised similarly, I can take it up with Worry Free.

 

[Fin59]

Hey, if the airlines ever decide to start doing the $50 for the second bag thing to Mexico, too, this would be a way for some folks to make it with just one bag.

 

[budaman]

Wear your wetsuit aboard along with your BC & you could probably get by with just a carryon

Mike

Wyndham & Sabor May 10-17......will let you know how it turns out.

 

[PARADISE HUNTER]

It gives a new meaning to "fruit bowl" at the buffet line.

 

[ggunn]

It gives a new meaning to "fruit bowl" at the buffet line.

At least you didn't say anything about nuts...

 

[Mawg]

At least you didn't say anything about nuts...

Good one Gordo. This could get outa hand real soon.