Scared Silly
Contributor
It was the best of dives, it was the worst of dives...
So the above has nothing to do with my question but I thought the title was catchy. The Mrs. would like to have a set doubles for herself for some of our deeper longer ocean dives as well as for a little cavern poking around. At 5'4" and around 125lbs she has used some larger cylinders - 95s found the mass to be too much. I was thinking about having her try some LP85s but then noticed these LP80s. Which look similar to Al80s but are less weight. If one were to add 3.5 lbs to the 80s they would have the same buoyancy characterists. I do not really think the extra .5" (or really 1" when doubled) or the reduction of 5/10cuft would make much of a difference.
So what else would folks take into consideration? Below are the specs from Faber:
2640 80cuft 7.5" dia 25" 27lbs +3.5empty -3.5full $180
2400 +10% 85cuft 7.0" dia 26" 31lbs 0empty -6.7full $200-$275
(Worthingtons are less but weigh 3 lbs more).
So the above has nothing to do with my question but I thought the title was catchy. The Mrs. would like to have a set doubles for herself for some of our deeper longer ocean dives as well as for a little cavern poking around. At 5'4" and around 125lbs she has used some larger cylinders - 95s found the mass to be too much. I was thinking about having her try some LP85s but then noticed these LP80s. Which look similar to Al80s but are less weight. If one were to add 3.5 lbs to the 80s they would have the same buoyancy characterists. I do not really think the extra .5" (or really 1" when doubled) or the reduction of 5/10cuft would make much of a difference.
So what else would folks take into consideration? Below are the specs from Faber:
2640 80cuft 7.5" dia 25" 27lbs +3.5empty -3.5full $180
2400 +10% 85cuft 7.0" dia 26" 31lbs 0empty -6.7full $200-$275
(Worthingtons are less but weigh 3 lbs more).