A beginner's guide to sifting through the nonsense -- Part 2

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Thanks, Diver0001, that was a treat.
 
But where is part one?
 
Great post. Thanks!
I *so* wish I had known those things when I first logged on here :)
 
shoredivr:
But where is part one?






PART I: http://scubaboard.com/showthread.php?t=181904&highlight=beginner's+guide

ROTURNERS BEGINNER'S GUIDE TO SHIFTING THROUGH THE NONSENSE, PART I:


I'm going to kick off a thread here about what to watch for and what to watch *out* for when you read people's responses to your questions.

I'll try to keep this short so it can be used as a framework for other people to post their suggestions too.

On the crowd mentality

First of all, these internet forums are just like any other crowd. At a football game if 50,000 people start cheering, you'll probably start cheering too. It might be because there's something to cheer for and it might just be because everyone is cheering. If you're like me then you've done "the wave" so you know what I'm talking about.

It's like that on the internet too. At the moment there are 70,000 people on Scubaboard and we do sometimes act like a large crowd. One time you see this (certainly not the only time) is if you post a question like "I'm having trouble with my trim, can someone help me?"

A question like this will inevitably evoke the cheers of "get rid of your jacket", "Buy a backplate and wing!", "You need new flippers" and things like this. It can be confusing when you ask a question about your trim and you get 50 responses telling you that you bought the wrong gear. However, amongst the 50 cheers about replacing the entire contents of your dive-bag, one or two people will respond with "what is your problem", "tell us more", "have you changed anything".

Put succinctly, like this, it's clear to see who you should listen to. On some of the threads it's not clear at all.... As a general rule (there are exceptions) if you think you're having a problem with a skill and people start talking about gear, you can probably ignore them. Even if a *lot* of people start repeating what one or two people said then consider the possibility that we're (I say we because everyone gets sucked into it sometimes) we're saying it out of a crowd mentality and look for the people who are thinking along with you, even if they're in the minority.

On the subject of gear.

If you drive a car, then you'll know that some people love Fords and some people hate them. Both the lovers and the haters are passionate and if you ask about a Ford in a bar, you're lucky if it doesn't start a fight.... Well the same thing happens here. Many people who interact with each other online do so very *very* bluntly. Opinions given are often defended as if they are of considerable importance when in fact, the reality doesn't matter nearly as much. If you ask "which computer should I buy" then you'll see the name of every computer on the market. You'll also see crowds forming to cheer for a certain computer and crowds forming to boo it. How on earth are you supposed to see the forest for the trees through all of that jostling around for attention? Look for the one or two posts that address your question. Someone will say "what kind of diving are you doing" or they'll make a nice unbiased comparison between different computers. Those are the posts you're looking for.

Moreover, on the subject of gear, people will not only advise you about what to buy. We will also (vehemently) advise you about what *NOT* to buy. (The ones who hate Fords).

Consider this. If someone is saying to you, "Mares flippers suck big doo-doo", how big do you think the chance is that they actually *have* Mares flippers?

Did the coin just drop?

In fact, the most vocal 'haters' of just about everything out there are usually the least likely people to have much experience diving in the gear they hate. Why people do this is probably a good topic for a doctoral thesis in psychology but the fact is that we do. In large numbers.... all the time. For example, if you say "I'm thinking about buying a HUB, what do you think". Then you'll hear people who bought a bp/wing (backplate & wing) right out of the gate, say that they hate all jackets and they hate the HUB even more.... even though they may have never worn a jacket and they may have never even *seen* a HUB..... Likewise, if you say "I'm thinking about buying this or that computer" then some joker who doesn't have a computer will come on and say "computers rot your brain" (I'm going to come back to this). In fact as a general rule consider every piece of negative feedback you receive very carefully and ask the poster if they have actual experience with the bit of gear you're talking about of if they only have an opinion. Personally, I'd be more inclined to believe someone with real world experience.

On the subject of religion.

Getting back to the comment above that people will say "computers rot your brain". If you walk around in a big city then you'll see different groups of people. The skin-heads, the goth, the skaters, the bikers etc etc. Subcultures. Little groups within a big group who share the same ideas and values. Well we have subcultures in scuba diving too. Hogarthian, DIR, Solo divers, Tech divers... you name it. Each one of those groups have things that they hold very dear to their own philosophy and identity. For example, every single Hogarthian diver out there has a regulator with a very long hose attaching it to the tank. Ergo, if you ask a question like "I'm thinking about buying a new regulator, what do I need" *someone* will tell you that you *need* a long-hose. If you *actually* need one or not is not their concern. They believe that *everyone* *always* needs a long-hose.... It's just the nature of the subculture beast. What you can do about that to avoid getting bad advice is twofold. First ask a control question back for example, if someone says to you "you need a long-hose" ask them about their flavour. For example, you can say "do you believe I need a long-hose because of your own diving style". Some people will be upfront about it and other people will be more evasive. Keep probing.

It's like that with a lot of topics. Gear is one. Training is another, but it also extends to skills, protocols and in some cases outside of the realm of diving.... fitness, mental health and so forth..... The main thing here is to try to grasp the context in which someone makes a particular comment. For example, If someone says "computers rot your brain" then you can bet a kilogram of banana's that they believe in DIR. If someone says "your buddy is a liability" then you can put your bananas on "Solo diver" and so forth. So the second thing you can do when you hear things that don't seem to make immediate sense is ask yourself "why is he/she saying that". Maybe it's because of a belief. Over time you'll get a feeling for which key concepts belong to which subcultures and you'll be able to put things in better context. In the mean while try to understand the context of a particular comment as best you can.

The last thing to say about that is to weigh the comments and take what you can from it. You can't believe everything everyone says. Some subcultures have incompatible values as well (DIR and Solo divers, for example). Try to remain open and (this is my own belief) try to resist jumping on any particular horse until you have some idea of which horses are running in the race.

So there we go. There's a start. I hope other people will add to this. I'm sorry it's so long but I guess if you read this far it must have been worth it.

R..
__________________
 
Diver0001:
So who can you trust? Nobody.
Thank goodness I never took this advice. As I learned whom to trust, my betters were kind and generous enough to mentor me and teach me so very much I didn't know. I still am learning so much from so many.

There are some members on this board that I absolutely trust. Without that trust, I can learn from no one.
 
I would add that the more emotion is obvious in a post, the less attention one should generally pay to the content. Good information should be rational, and should be supported by rational arguments. And a wonderful question is, "Why?" If someone tells you you should do this, or buy that, or take that class, or avoid that dive op, the important information lies in the "why". If someone can defend their position in an articulate and reasoned fashion, the advice may be valuable. If all they can do is bluster, if probably isn't.
 
Rick Inman:
Thank goodness I never took this advice. As I learned whom to trust, my betters were kind and generous enough to mentor me and teach me so very much I didn't know. I still am learning so much from so many.

There are some members on this board that I absolutely trust. Without that trust, I can learn from no one.

I think this is an excellent point, Rick. However, coming in unware of who to trust, I would advice scepticism. Trust will always develop because it's primary to human nature.

R..
 
Charlie99:
That's a fact. We see it that way too. Common knowledge (with a mean of 3, standard deviation of 4.5) tells us that this is the best way. A very skilled diver, who stayed at the Holiday Inn Express last night told me that this is the only way.

The mean and standard deviation aren't enough here, I would want to know skewness and leptokurtosis before trusting this statement, or at least a log transformation of the data....oh, and I tend not to trust non-parametric studies over studies using inferential stats with power & effect sizes reported (omega instead of eta please).
 
Thanks for your posts Diver0001. Sage advise and nicely put. I probably use similar phrase matching to determine whether I value a point of view but have never defined them.

I hope we will not outlaw them, scubaboard would be far less fun if bun fights were rationliased out.
 
EastEndDiver:
And mostly watch for someone who starts off saying "I stayed at a Holiday Inn Express..........".

This would be the *one* I would listen to... at least there seems to be an element of integrity in the introduction...

Great thread... but missing one critical definition for me... what does putting "Scubaboard Guru" under you name mean??? :rofl3: :rofl3:
 

Back
Top Bottom