Let's compare apples to apples a HArley is a collectors item which appreciates over time, a dive computer is a consumable electronic that does not. A better comparison would be with a refridgerator. You would not pay MSRP for a 10 year old fridge even if it was brand new and was best in its class 10 years ago. There better ones with better technology available now. That's what we are saying
We aren't disputing that this technology isn't tried and true. What we are discussing is that there is newer technology that is more accurate, cheaper, more reliable, more user friendly and more accessible for the average person.
Do you disagree with that Jax?
Would you pay for that 10 year old fridge?
But we are not talking about a 10-year-old-fridge -- we are talking about known algorithms and a safety of life issue.
The only change in the Uwatec bottom timer, over the past 10 years, is an added "average depth" calculation. Yet people keep paying top dollar for it.
Why? Because Uwatec is tried and true, and has withstood the test of time. One point few seem to notice is "fail-safe". I keep seeing postings on how computers "go diving by themselves" (registering depth on the surface). I see postings on "my computer doesn't agree with my friend's computer". None are Uwatec.
Why? When Uwatec fails, it fails. You don't get false readings, or bad calculations, you get an error message or flat dead.
About the first time a computer made me question its operation would be the last time I used that type of computer, period.
My 13-year-old Aladin Pro Ultra died in Bonaire. I'll bet you a dollar to a donut that every dive it took is still on it when I get it back from repair. My other Uwatecs are fat and happy. Is it annoying to send some off for a battery? No, because every time I get them back, they have several operational depth tests. I'm okay with that.
Still, I am MUCH more fond of my iRDA Uwatecs. The Aladin Pro Ultra is my tertiary backup.