809 feet?
- Thread starter pauldw
- Start date
Please register or login
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
- Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
- A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
- You can make this box go away
Kay Dee
Contributor
Pardon. Failed posting, see next.
Kay Dee
Contributor
What Guinness did was stop reporting deep air records, not all scuba diving records.Sorry you don't seem to care about the truth.Deepest scuba dive (female)
www.guinnessworldrecords.com
broncobowsher
Contributor
Michael Menduno published an article a couple years ago reporting on the theory that a men's deep dive record was achieved by cheating. It went into great detail on how that cheating could have been done. What I got out of it was that not only was the record accepted by Guinness, they supervised the attempt and built in safeguards to prevent such cheating. You can't just write to Guinness and tell them you broke the record.
Kay Dee
Contributor
I have never read it, but are you saying M2's article / theory was incorrect then? Dont suppose you recall / care to devulge the diver invloved in the record in question? I dont seem to recall (no surprise there though
) a depth 'record' that was seriously called into question, but then I've never cared much for records or followed them either.However, even if M2 was incorrect, it would'nt be the first time someone cheated / faked a dive to set a record, or claim a 'first', thats for sure!
But on the other hand, while a letter might not do, a Guinness representitive does not / is not present on every record set that they recognise.
I made no judgement on the article--I just mentioned it because of the belief expressed in this thread that Guinness does not record scuba depth records. The article described their efforts to verify the legitimacy of the record, clearly indicating that they do indeed recognize those records.I have never read it, but are you saying M2's article / theory was incorrect then? Dont suppose you recall / care to devulge the diver invloved in the record in question? I dont seem to recall (no surprise there though
However, even if M2 was incorrect, it would'nt be the first time someone cheated / faked a dive to set a record, or claim a 'first', thats for sure!
But on the other hand, while a letter might not do, a Guinness representitive does not / is not present on every record set that they recognise.
Ayisha
Contributor
I have never read it, but are you saying M2's article / theory was incorrect then? Dont suppose you recall / care to devulge the diver invloved in the record in question? I dont seem to recall (no surprise there though
Fact or Fiction? Part 1
Fact or Fiction? Part 2
Guinness Concludes Review
SB - Record Deep Dive Challenged
Kay Dee
Contributor
Karen van den Oever Continues to Push the Depth at Bushmansgat: Her New Record—246m
Karen van den Oever recently broke her own world cave diving depth record by a little more than 10m/33 ft at Bushmansgat cave in South Africa. The S.African cave diver conducted the 8 hour 14 min high-altitude dive on open circuit scuba, breathing trimix 4/90 bottom mix, and suffered mild High...
gue.com
Similar threads
- Question
