logan brown
New
That was a mistake on the report, my family was very very close to Mac. He was breathing nitroxSo two guys try to reach 500 ft depth on air, end up dead... and sharks get blamed for it?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
That was a mistake on the report, my family was very very close to Mac. He was breathing nitroxSo two guys try to reach 500 ft depth on air, end up dead... and sharks get blamed for it?
Nitrox would actually be far more dangerous (and stupider) to use on a 500ft dive. Maybe you meant trimix? If you actually know the exact gas mix(es) he used, or other details of the what the hell really happened in this wild tale, please consider sharing that information. It could help set the record straight, and understanding what happened in any accident will help other people dive more safely in the future.That was a mistake on the report, my family was very very close to Mac. He was breathing nitrox
That was a mistake on the report, my family was very very close to Mac. He was breathing nitrox
Nitrox would actually be far more dangerous (and stupider) to use on a 500ft dive. Maybe you meant trimix?
.At that depth, nitrox vs air doesn't matter. Anyone that knows even the basics of diving understands this.
.
Actually, nitrox vs air makes a HUGE difference. Not to dismiss the obvious and serious risk, but the world record for breathing air on scuba, is over 500ft, and has been since the 90s. In fact, when I was working in cozumel years ago, I was actively working towards beating Bret Gilliams (then) record, and have been well below 400 ft, several times, and several friends have also been nearly as deep.
Nitrox on the other hand would have guaranteed fatalities, well before reaching those depths, so nitrox vs air would have made a highly significant difference.
And neither is dead by drowning after passing out.Either way, passed out is no way to be when the alleged shark comes at you.
And neither is dead by drowning after passing out.
Of all the fish in the sea, the most common one is the one divers rarely see--a dead fish. Animals that die in the ocean usually get eaten pretty quickly.
Notice that the diver had bites on him when he was found, but that's it. He had not been fully eaten. When I went to Maui more than a decade ago, just before I arrived, a snorkeler had been bitten on the thigh by a tiger shark. He managed to get to shore with the help of other snorkelers who then successfully provided first aid. While they were working on him, the chunk of his thigh that had been bitten off floated in. The shark had apparently spit it out.
A year or two ago, divers ascending at the end of the dive in Socorro were harassed by a tiger shark, and as they reached the surface, the shark attacked one and inflicted a fatal bite. I have been paying attention to these stories for a long time, and it is the only one I know in which a shark attacked a diver that it had identified as "not prey" at depth, with the exception of spearfishers or others with captured fish. It could indeed be possible that a shark made an investigative bite that proved fatal on this man, but I would sincerely doubt it made fatal investigative bites on both of them.