jhelmuth
Contributor
detroit diver:Excuse me, but who's leaving the impression? I answered a question, and was slammed because I was trained with an agency that someone obviously despises.
As for your computer/algorithm suggestion, you just don't get it. We DONT USE COMPUTERS. PERIOD. We don't cut tables or charts from computers. We don't deco from computers. We don't watch the bar graphs on the computer. I'll say it again: WE DON'T USE COMPUTERS. (well, actually, I use one to graph my dives for downloading later. But it's kept in guage mode while diving.). That's why TX101 and your comments are just so funny and absurd. You make silly accusations when you have zero knowledge of the facts. And no, you can't read it in a book or other printed media (unless someone from the class has posted it). Even with that, you need to know the parameters in which to use the information.
Believe it or not, it's actually a fairly simple process. Surprisingly so.
2 things...
[1] Your members do cut tables from PDAs (they are computers) - I've seen 'em do it,
and
[2] You (or anyone else) have not discovered some "secret science".
DIR divers do use computers (even if it doesn't include you) - just not in the water (good - I agree and think your better off for doing it that way). What you know can be found in books and your knowledge is neither secret nor is it proven to be more correct than the sum of all knowledge. SHow me just one thing in how you cut tables which is a "secret" that no one else knows or can't be found in other printed media. Sorry to burst your bubble, but DIR is but one small segment of the dive community. One which I entirely respect and think is doing it right in fact, but not without it's own baggage. You make DIR look ugly and are a poster child for the anti-DIR community. You really ought to go off and hide. It would be so much better for the DIR community as a whole.
You are the one who just doesn't get it!