10 yr old Wreck Diver

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

At what point have 10-year olds ...

  • Gone the Moon (over five freakin' times, and even took a freaking CAR up there)
  • Built Hoover Dam
  • built a skyscraper
  • even so much as attempted what Orville and Wilbur did
  • coined the phrase "free enterprise
 
At what point have 10-year olds ...

  • Gone the Moon (over five freakin' times, and even took a freaking CAR up there)
  • Built Hoover Dam
  • built a skyscraper
  • even so much as attempted what Orville and Wilbur did
  • coined the phrase "free enterprise

:confused: You lost me on that one.
 
It was a reply to the previous post.

The human accomplishments - and underlying sense of adventure, risk and challenge is an amazing thing.

To compare these endeavors (moon landings etc) with the act of taking a 10 year old boy (a minor) on a dive that breaks numerous industry standards/recommendations is ludicrous.

10 year old boys don't go to the moon, or build bridges. They are minors.... who are legally deemed unable to understand and calculate personal risk and consequences. This just isn't legal "You're gonna die!" naysaying.... it is a great deal of common sense.

Likewise... when astronauts went to the moon, or when Hilary climbed Everest.... every effort and intelligence was put into effect in order to maximise safety. Whilst embarking on novel and dangerous pursuits, those involved still made every effort to formulate and apply the most effective safety protocols and measures that they could.

Taking a minor on a dive that delibertely and willfully violates existing safety protocols and measures is not adventurous, it is just plain irresponsible.

It doesn't teach the child to 'be a real man'. It teaches the child to disregard sensible recommendations, to ignore prudent advice and to dive in a haphazard and dangerous way. In short, bad role modelling as a father and as a professional dive instructor.
 
Thanks for the statements above. There are numerous cases where parents (mostly fathers) have pushed their children beyond standards. Some of the scuba-related instances have resulted in fatalities.

In the very end, and as mentioned above the kids are minors. This means they are not (in the eyes of the law) fully capable of informed decisions. So, for folks pushing kids so hard - best to consider who they are doing the pushing for.

Cheers,

X
 
Hey "Captain", (if you are still following this thread) I have a question for you.

How in the hell did you live through teaching yourself to dive? I read your profile and you say you taught yourself back in 1957 I think it was. Man, do you realize you are a miracle walking? Do you know just how many times you cheated death? Did you not realize that every time you entered the water your life was hanging by a thread?

Maybe you just made your profile up. I mean it's just beyond me that a person could possibly teach themselves to dive. Don't you know that you can't safely learn to dive unless you take course after course after course and follow/abide by every single rule/protocol/measure/recommendation/thought or idea that is taught by every single agency that is out there now?

Too bad the writers of the Marvel Comic books didn't meet you years ago. Had they learned of your feat, you may very well have become a Superhero!
 
It was a reply to the previous post.

The human accomplishments - and underlying sense of adventure, risk and challenge is an amazing thing.

To compare these endeavors (moon landings etc) with the act of taking a 10 year old boy (a minor) on a dive that breaks numerous industry standards/recommendations is ludicrous.

10 year old boys don't go to the moon, or build bridges. They are minors.... who are legally deemed unable to understand and calculate personal risk and consequences. This just isn't legal "You're gonna die!" naysaying.... it is a great deal of common sense.

Likewise... when astronauts went to the moon, or when Hilary climbed Everest.... every effort and intelligence was put into effect in order to maximise safety. Whilst embarking on novel and dangerous pursuits, those involved still made every effort to formulate and apply the most effective safety protocols and measures that they could.

Taking a minor on a dive that delibertely and willfully violates existing safety protocols and measures is not adventurous, it is just plain irresponsible.

It doesn't teach the child to 'be a real man'. It teaches the child to disregard sensible recommendations, to ignore prudent advice and to dive in a haphazard and dangerous way. In short, bad role modelling as a father and as a professional dive instructor.

I think some of the positive comments made in support of my posting the video were a little over the top: "being a REAL man" etc. but I do appreciate the sentiment and understand it. I don't view the dive outings as quite that macho, probably because I have seen so many people get killed while diving around me. I respect it and it scares me a little.

Never the less, the repeated theme that I must follow, Say PADI's guidlines is a little ridiculous as well. I no longer teach diving and would be more than happy if PADI "repealed my former certification" because it might reduce my liability when diving with other people (not necessarily my kids). But I doubt that would happen. As an aside, I rigorously follwed standards when I worked as a professional, the liability risk to breaking standards made not following the rules something I would never consider. However, for my own diving, I pretty much do what I think is reasonable.

Years ago, PADI (and others) set the minimum age for cert at 13. Anyone even thinking of taking a 10-yr old diving would be considered reckless by many divers. Now PADI says 10 is okay for some very basic diving. I disagree with the standard and think 10 is far too young for a majority of kids. However, there are exceptions when a child is highly motivated, and has well developed watermanship skills and unusal cognitive abilities.

I taught my boys to freedive and scuba and the scuba training they received from me was far more rigorous and extensive than any open water course on the market.

Both boys are comfortable in the water, actually they are so fearless that it scares me a little. I constantly show them reports of people getting killed and they have heard my "war stories" many times. However, they are comfortable removing their scuba gear underwater and think nothing of buddy breathing (NOT shairing an octopus) while neither of us is wearing a mask, while on an open water dive. In fact, a few years ago, I accidentally knocked my older son's regulator out of his mouth while we were
back inside the exact same wreck. (I've been going in there for over 20 years now) He thought I was just "testing" him again and shook his head in disgust as he ever so calmly replaced the regulator.


They are required to wear a pony bottle with a bungi around their neck and have developed the motor skills to immediately go to it in an emergency. They can both freedive comfortably below 30 feet.

I think PADI is EXTREMELY irresponsible for not demanding that 10 yr old certified divers carry an adequate, independent redundant scuba system for dives over 25-30 feet. People need to avoid blindly following a company that has commercial interests as it's primary goal. Additionaly over the last 30 or so years, I have seen the bar be set lower and lower for students (as well as dive professionals).

I do not casually push the guidlines, but try to make sure that the kids have a realistic understanding of the risks of diving. They dive when they want to, not because I force them.
 
I do recognize that some children have physical and cognitive capabilities beyond their age. However, the standards were developed by the industry for a few reasons - liability and safety. In my personal experience I see no reason to push the edge with kids - even if they say, or can sometimes demonstrate abilities in excess of their peers, or standards.

I have also seen the direct result of kids and other adults pushing the edge which resulted in fatalities. I never, ever want to be the one to break the news to a loved one that their child, spouse etc. died while diving under my supervision.

I've taught countless teens over the years and there are two principles I abide by: conservatism and modeling best practices in diving. The latter meaning following standards to the tee. No deviation from the standard - ever.

So, realistic guidelines are the ones posted by the dive agency - especially if you are, or were an instructor. There is plenty of time for kids to mature into adults where they can enjoy the pleasures of diving at their own risk.

X - Scuba Instructor Trainer
 
Oh come on, I don't know the details of that wreck but based on the video, it looks like swiss cheese. It looked more like an advanced swim through that OW divers are escorted through all the time. It certainly wasn't any Andrea Doria penetration dive.

I can only hope to do as thorough training with my daughter as Dumpster is doing with his sons.
 
Years ago, PADI (and others) set the minimum age for cert at 13. Anyone even thinking of taking a 10-yr old diving would be considered reckless by many divers. Now PADI says 10 is okay for some very basic diving. I disagree with the standard and think 10 is far too young for a majority of kids. However, there are exceptions when a child is highly motivated, and has well developed watermanship skills and unusal cognitive abilities.

PADI do allow 10 year olds to dive.... however, it is not carte blanc....

Parent’s Responsibility: to help evaluate your medical, physical and emotional readiness to participate in scuba diving.
Both boys are comfortable in the water, actually they are so fearless that it scares me a little.

Fearless = unable to process and assess personal risk. THis is why the law deems them as minors.

They are required to wear a pony bottle with a bungi around their neck and have developed the motor skills to immediately go to it in an emergency. They can both freedive comfortably below 30 feet.

I think PADI is EXTREMELY irresponsible for not demanding that 10 yr old certified divers carry an adequate, independent redundant scuba system for dives over 25-30 feet. People need to avoid blindly following a company that has commercial interests as it's primary goal. Additionaly over the last 30 or so years, I have seen the bar be set lower and lower for students (as well as dive professionals).

1. Why would 10 years olds need redundancy, when adults don't? For the sake of this arguement...either everyone should have redundancy, or no-one.

2. Remind yourself of the depth restrictions PADI puts on 'minor' divers... when would a 10 year old ever be below 30feet?

3. Why would a 10 year old be more capable of dealing with the increased task loading of carrying a redundant air system than an adult?

I do not casually push the guidlines, but try to make sure that the kids have a realistic understanding of the risks of diving. They dive when they want to, not because I force them.

As you already stated....your kids are "fearless". How can you impress upon them the risks of diving, when they are not sufficiently emotionally matured to understand the concept that they can die...or what that actually means?
 
Years ago, PADI (and others) set the minimum age for cert at 13. Anyone even thinking of taking a 10-yr old diving would be considered reckless by many divers. Now PADI says 10 is okay for some very basic diving. I disagree with the standard and think 10 is far too young for a majority of kids. However, there are exceptions when a child is highly motivated, and has well developed watermanship skills and unusal cognitive abilities.

PADI do allow 10 year olds to dive.... however, it is not carte blanc....

Parent’s Responsibility: to help evaluate your medical, physical and emotional readiness to participate in scuba diving.

Both boys are comfortable in the water, actually they are so fearless that it scares me a little.

Fearless = unable to process and assess personal risk. THis is why the law deems them as minors.

They are required to wear a pony bottle with a bungi around their neck and have developed the motor skills to immediately go to it in an emergency. They can both freedive comfortably below 30 feet.

I think PADI is EXTREMELY irresponsible for not demanding that 10 yr old certified divers carry an adequate, independent redundant scuba system for dives over 25-30 feet. People need to avoid blindly following a company that has commercial interests as it's primary goal. Additionaly over the last 30 or so years, I have seen the bar be set lower and lower for students (as well as dive professionals).

1. Why would 10 years olds need redundancy, when adults don't? For the sake of this arguement...either everyone should have redundancy, or no-one.

2. Remind yourself of the depth restrictions PADI puts on 'minor' divers... when would a 10 year old ever be below 30feet?

3. Why would a 10 year old be more capable of dealing with the increased task loading of carrying a redundant air system than an adult?

I do not casually push the guidlines, but try to make sure that the kids have a realistic understanding of the risks of diving. They dive when they want to, not because I force them.

As you already stated....your kids are "fearless". How can you impress upon them the risks of diving, when they are not sufficiently emotionally matured to understand the concept that they can die...or what that actually means?
 

Back
Top Bottom