Feedback on recent two-tank and dive limits

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Good reminder to refresh myself on the basics of dive planning rather than relying too much on my computer
One big reason computers are popular is they deal with multi-level profiles extremely well. If you had tried to plan your dive based on a square profile at max depth, your allowable bottom time would have been quite short. You could dive that reduced time, but why would you?

Personally, I'd say a better reminder would be to pay MORE attention to your dive computer, rather than to rely less upon it. It is a far better tool for the type of diving you're doing compared to the "basic planning" that you can realistically do.
 
Therein lies your issue as to why the NDL was at one point 1 minute. All other setting aside, 35 minutes is a short surface interval. Why the rush to get back in the water?

Most divers plan for a 1 hour surface interval. Why? besides being a round number, it gives many tissues just enough time that the loading on the second dive does not run into a NDL. Even if diving to a similar depth.
Oh absolutely. And it was a situation where the dive guides rushed everyone in and I just didn’t clock the time. I have some questions about the guides in general, since when we arrived they were going to take some discover scuba folks on a 100’ wreck dive (which I learned later).

But definitely on me for 1) not keeping track of the SI, and 2) not insisting on more boat time when they rushed everyone back in for dive #2. Won’t do it again.
 
One big reason computers are popular is they deal with multi-level profiles extremely well. If you had tried to plan your dive based on a square profile at max depth, your allowable bottom time would have been quite short. You could dive that reduced time, but why would you?

Personally, I'd say a better reminder would be to pay MORE attention to your dive computer, rather than to rely less upon it. It is a far better tool for the type of diving you're doing compared to the "basic planning" that you can realistically do.
Agree and I typically pay very close attention to it. Definitely a case of multiple dive variables (low and changing viz combined with shifting currents, easily the most challenging dive my son has done) distracting me in a way I haven’t had before.

I’m not saying I want to rely less on the computer, but that I want to revisit my basics (tables, GF, etc) to help better understand the “why” behind the computer. So I won’t have to ask questions like this that I should know myself, essentially ;)

I really do appreciate the feedback and am super grateful for everyone’s responses.
 
Thanks, all! I hadn’t had this happen before even with deeper depths, but it’s perfectly possible I shifted my computer settings since then because it’s been a few years. (I’ve been diving with my son since last year, so much shallower and easier than previous years with friends.) I revisited the tables but wanted to check with folks here, since you all are a wealth of knowledge.

I think my biggest lesson is that I’m not ready to be in more challenging conditions with my kiddo-as-buddy. He had a great dive, but it made me a touch more anxious than needed. Good reminder to refresh myself on the basics of dive planning rather than relying too much on my computer - for my own peace of mind as much as anything else. Thanks again!
YES, a good lesson. Diving with someone who you are responsible for (and who you know is potentially challenged by the upcoming dive) is (or can be) extremely distracting. It is much easier to dive solo than when you have a buddy like that. I am much more likely to make mistakes when gearing up and also during the dive when I place too much concentration on the buddy and not enough on myself and the dive.
 
This feels like the answer ^^^

I’m not familiar with how gradient factors work and am sure I would have been less concerned if I was. Not sure if it’s me not remembering from my dive training, that OW and AOW courses didn’t go into it in detail, or both. Either way, it’s on me to learn now. Thanks for this 🙏
 
I’m not saying I want to rely less on the computer, but that I want to revisit my basics (tables, GF, etc) to help better understand the “why” behind the computer. So I won’t have to ask questions like this that I should know myself, essentially ;)

I really do appreciate the feedback and am super grateful for everyone’s responses.

Here are a few articles I’ve found helpful:





 
YES, a good lesson. Diving with someone who you are responsible for (and who you know is potentially challenged by the upcoming dive) is (or can be) extremely distracting. It is much easier to dive solo than when you have a buddy like that. I am much more likely to make mistakes when gearing up and also during the dive when I place too much concentration on the buddy and not enough on myself and the dive.
Absolutely. I have a different mindset diving with my son than, say, friends or other adult buddies. Until yesterday I thought it made me more cautious, but I’m realizing I wasn’t necessarily cautious about the right things. Ironically, he’s turning into a fantastic junior diver so my worries are largely misplaced. He’s actually the one who flagged the SI and I used it as a lesson that he’s my equal underwater and I’m relying on him to clock things I might miss. But great caution on missing things in gear check - I could imagine being so focused on him I might goof on myself.
 
Here are a few articles I’ve found helpful:





Amazing, thank you!
 
This feels like the answer ^^^

I’m not familiar with how gradient factors work and am sure I would have been less concerned if I was. Not sure if it’s me not remembering from my dive training, that OW and AOW courses didn’t go into it in detail, or both. Either way, it’s on me to learn now. Thanks for this 🙏

Yup in adaptative it will give you a safety like the previous post mention.

I suggest you read the manual in detail for the sherwater, everything is well described. Also check you tube penty of video will explain you what are the gradient factors. OW or AOW don't cover this cause because it's computer related and every brand out there is different.

Be safe
 

Back
Top Bottom