Travel BPW Setup

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

you didn't find the bottom of the tank cylinder rising up as it emptied? With a single strap (at least on the Aeris version) and no stiff spine, it was really annoying. I couldn't figure out how to address this without really hacking it up. I just sold it instead.
If memory serves it had one tank band and a lower Velcro strap to help with stability. My outlaw has only the strap and I didn’t notice any issue.
 
I’ve switched to an Aqualung Outlaw, it’s easy to disassemble and pack into nooks and crannies.
I love mine for travel, complete minimalist set up and packs down to nothing
 
I can take a few pictures when I get home from work
Main section has the plate in the laptop sleeve, the wing, reg bag, and a pocket with the harness rollee up in it.

20220803_193952.jpg


Second pocket has a padded case with my computer and flashlight, the trim weight pockets with the cam bands rolled up in them, dmsb/reel, and normally my mask which happens to not be in it at the moment.

20220803_193908.jpg


Other exterior pockets are still empty.


It's some Jansport Trans backpack. Looks like maybe a youth large based on similar ones for sale on ebay.
 
Nice, thanks for the pics.
Makes sense to break it down like that, fits well in the pack and is travel easy.
 
My aluminum plate weight around 800 grams, there are metal plates lighter than that (x shaped or titanium etc) but I do not expect more than 20 percent weight cut.

The lightest plate I've seen was a knock off of the XDeep NX series BP, but setup to use normal webbing. IIRC it was less than a pound, which is like 400grams.

It is dog bone shaped (X Shaped), lightened, and made out of a lighter thinner aluminum alloy. You can find them on eBay or Amazon.
 
Well the lightest plates are the VDH (currently NA) and the Oxy Ultralite plate:


And the Oxy Ultralite does work with the VDH wings and Oxy wings.

I never understood toting about a heavy stainless (double tank) plate when a couple of cam band pouches accomplish the same thing with the supplied weights at most destinations. I guess none of you guys have camera gear to carry aboard?



N
 
I do. It's a much bulkier substitute for lead than a steel backplate.
I have my cameras set for neutral to no more than a few ounces negative, with my dome port it is actually slightly positive so I can not use my camera as ballast.

If you mean the cam band pouches, nah, not bulky at all.

Ages ago I carried my weight belt with pretty blue bullet weights on it on trips. I guess that is no worse than carrying about a heavy plate. And not to enter the argument of jettison-able ballast yet again, but without exposure protection or minimal protection and no ballast to dump, I would be negative on the surface with a failed BC wing. That is okay with some folks but not me.

James
 
I think you missed the joke I was trying to make.

For me, the steel backplate vs al backplate is a simple swap out. Doesn't take up any more room and because I'm carrying it on, the weight doesn't make a difference either.

In the context of the conversation above, you were talking about using available weights instead of a steel plate and then mentioned traveling with camera gear.

The joke being that it read as if you were suggesting camera gear as ballast. Obviously you weren't actually.
 
I think you missed the joke I was trying to make.

For me, the steel backplate vs al backplate is a simple swap out. Doesn't take up any more room and because I'm carrying it on, the weight doesn't make a difference either.

In the context of the conversation above, you were talking about using available weights instead of a steel plate and then mentioned traveling with camera gear.

The joke being that it read as if you were suggesting camera gear as ballast. Obviously you weren't actually.

Sorry, I am not all that swift sometimes. Well, perhaps because my previous camera I did use it for ballast and trim. It was a heavy sucker! And I had that discussion on a dive boat with a fellow just a few days ago who also uses his cameras as part of his ballast weight. I guess that is one way to have jettison-able ballast :wink:. But, alas, his consideration on abandoning his camera if in a state of duress was much like mine in that the only way we would surrender our photo gear is if a tiger shark takes it and us too :wink:, otherwise he is going to be in for a fight :). I was meaning for carry-on my camera gear takes up all that room :( .

James
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/perdix-ai/

Back
Top Bottom