DIR- GUE Why are non-GUE divers so interested in what GUE does?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Back in the day I got this book,
20220526_185342.jpg
I really did enjoy it and learned alot,
wish I had read it before or soon after my OW course ,

Would I take a course... maybe, but probably not,
Expense, time, and GUE is more my way or the hwy,,

I would rather read about it
And figure it out myself, and understand why, by doing it.

I also solo dive and and am self taught.
Most things I do are not necessary conventional, I guess being German background makes me a bit stubborn...
 
What is GUE? Is it tec or certain type of diving?
I have some notes compiled I'll share here; I try to exercise appropriate quality control, but I've never been involved with their training so there's potential for error. Apologies in advance if I've got errors here; since I've already got the notes written up in a handy form, and they include a few links that might be helpful, I'm posting.

GUE (Global Underwater Explorers) – A scuba diving organization using Hogarthian and DIR principles that issues certifications in both recreational and technical diving. Headquartered in High Springs, Florida. The ‘brand’ has a reputation for more demanding dive training to instill higher level proficiency compared to some mainstream agencies. They are best known in the general dive community for the course GUE Fundamentals, a demanding multi-day course introducing the GUE system and a pathway to follow up technical training (there are levels of ‘pass,’ a recreational and a technical rating; you might get a provisional pass with 6 months to improve and come back to earn a pass). GUE Fundamentals is often recommended to divers seeking a higher degree of dive skill proficiency (e.g.: instead of pursuing a Dive Master certification). A criticism is their rigid requirements; as of Dec. 24, 2021, GUE Fundamentals standards require the diver be at least 16-years old and a non-smoker. For more on GUE Fundamentals, see forum discussion.

----- They offer a lower level course called GUE Primer, introducing DIR gear configuration and basic skills and intended to improve your diving but not offering a certification.


But to make much sense of GUE, one needs to consider DIR. Here're my notes from checking into that:

DIR (Doing It Right) An unfortunate name that triggers pushback on the grounds it allegedly implies other ways of diving are ‘doing it wrong.’ DIR is a holistic approach to diving that draws on Hogarthian principles but goes beyond gear. The DIR approach emphasizes a dive team approach with standardized gear configuration and team procedures. It arose in the 1990 from efforts to the Woodville Karst Plain Project (WKPP) to reduce the fatality rate in area cave diving, and spread from cave to technical then recreational diving. The DIR philosophy informs the teaching and practices of organizations including GUE and UTD.

-----Strengths of DIR including time-tested well-thought-out gear choice and configuration, ease of joining a DIR team due to universal familiarity with the shared system, and interchangeability of divers. Be mindful it was designed with complex technical (e.g.: deep cave) diving in mind.


So, then one needs to consider Hogarthian diving. From my notes:

Hogarthian Diving Named for Bill Hogarth Main, a minimalist approach to dive gear implementation drawn from a holistic analysis of the system components. It emphasizes a balanced (properly weighted; not over-weighted) rig., weight distribution to aid proper trim, and generally uses a BP/W style BCD with a single piece of webbing for the harness. By sticking to needed basis and foregoing unnecessary ‘extras,’ it lends itself to a simple, stream-lined rig. that may be cheaper.

 
Ten replies so far, and not one of them fits the description of whom you're directing the question to. :popcorn:

I interpreted your question not as asking why they were interested in GUE but rather why, after learning about GUE, did they not pursue training with GUE. AmIright?
Yeah if this were a courtroom I'd be objecting to that question as vague and ambiguous, and also compound. Is the question why are divers from other agencies so curious? Is it why they ask questions instead of just signing up for Fundies right away to satisfy their curiosity? Or is it why, having asked questions and learned about GUE, they still aren't sold on the idea?

Since I don't get to make that objection and force the OP to rephrase, I'll just take a blind stab at it. I'm one of those noncommittal agnostic GUE-curious types. I did my OW, AOW, and Nitrox with PADI all within two months, before I'd ever heard of GUE. (I think I learned of its existence here.) I had some gripes with the cursory nature of my training, so I started looking into it. I didn't yet own any equipment other than a computer, mask and snorkel, fins and booties. Luckily my local dive shop rented BP/Ws, so I was able to try one out. I immediately liked it better and bought my own soon after. Around this time, I had an incident where my buddy went OOA, and there was a momentary struggle to free my octo for her (I had the hose bent and shoved through my shoulder D ring, which had been holding it much better than those rubber snorkel keepers), and I realized that whole primary donate/bungeed second thing might have been a better setup. So I was really starting to like some of their ideas.

But there were other ideas I wasn't so sure about. I'd bought a set of tables and taught myself to use them since they weren't covered in my OW class, and I was beginning to understand why people liked computers so much better. I had an instabuddy with terrible buoyancy my first time on the oil rigs--I had to grab him to keep him from sinking helplessly to the bottom 700 feet below, and I did not feel qualified for that. Part of me thought, well, that's an argument for sticking with an agency that's really big on team diving and skill mastery. But part of me thought, hey, *I'm* apparently competent enough for this dive, *I* don't want to have to jump through a bunch more hoops before they'll let me out there again, and I don't want to be limited to diving this site only when there's a GUE charter going out! So maybe I'd rather work toward solo, which of course is verboten in the GUE universe.

I did end up signing up for GUE Fundamentals Part 1 about 6 months after I was first certified. In addition to seeing the wisdom of some of their equipment choices, I wanted to nail this whole buoyancy, propulsion, and trim thing people kept talking about. But I wasn't sure I was all-in on what seemed almost like a whole religion. I'm fortunate; while some people have to travel just to find any GUE instructor, I have something like half a dozen to choose from in LA County alone, and I was able to get a recommendation for one who was a little less zealous than some of his peers. I reached out to him, explained where I was coming from, and asked if he'd be open to just doing a few private lessons with me to learn the skills, without working toward certification. He was amenable but also told me that I could just sign up for Part 1, as that was pretty much what I was looking for, and that if there was any required gear I didn't already own, he could either sell it to me or just let me borrow it for the class. I ended up buying my reg from him, and he set it up nicely with the long hose, bungee, and bolt snaps. And it was a great class, no regrets.

But it wasn't everything I felt I'd ever need to know, nor did it seem that my most pressing concerns would be addressed if I signed up for Part 2. Now that I had good trim, a low SAC rate, and a frog kick that could actually propel me forward, I was discovering that perhaps my biggest weakness as a diver was surf entries. I went diving with a group in Laguna Beach led by a couple of veteran California divers who aren't fans of GUE. One gave me a hard time about my gear and tried to convince me that split fins were better for these long surface swims, but he did help me a lot with learning to time my entries and exits. There was a local shop that led free guided night dives at Redondo Beach, and having done one night dive off a boat in Mexico, I was intrigued--but I was also, frankly, scared. I ended up taking another PADI course, Night Diver, one-on-one with an instructor who also helped me get a grip on beach diving in the dark. I also went to one of the 3Rs (Rocks, Rips, and Reefs) sessions with the LA County Underwater Unit, and it was one of the best things I ever did for my confidence. Being told that yeah, you can put your fins on first and walk in backward, instead of messing with that in the surf zone, and if you get knocked down on the way out, no problem, just crawl!-- that was a revelation. And then practicing it, and realizing it really was no big deal, further poisoned in my mind the idea that there could be just one Right way to Do It all, from Florida caves to California shores.

Six months after that, when it got cold again, I went back to PADI for my Rescue and then drysuit course. I did both with my local dive shop, which had earned my trust, and which at the time was going through sort of a weird slow-motion breakup with their GUE instructor (not the GUE chill pope I'd worked with before.) My instructor for both courses was certified to teach with multiple agencies and had some GUE training as well, and I kind of liked her hodgepodge best-of-all-worlds approach. For the rescue course, she was actually simultaneously teaching PADI (for me) and NAUI (for the other student); for the drysuit course, it was all PADI, but she told us to forget what the book said about using our suit for buoyancy and do it the GUE way, adding just enough air for warmth and squeeze relief and then making up any buoyancy gap with the wing. My chill pope GUE instructor, whom I talked into doing a one-off refresher to help me with this infernal back kick that was still largely eluding me, was mildly annoyed that I hadn't done GUE's drysuit primer, but couldn't name any other differences in what was taught, at least off the top of his head.

I did find the SoCal GUE community to be incredibly welcoming, not at all like the cloistered elitists some have made DIR folks out to be. Even though I was perpetually one-fin-in, one-fin-out with my half-finished Fundies course, they let me come along on their charters and buddied up with me. I was partly in awe of their dedication to physical fitness and skills practice, but partly exhausted just watching them. And I bristled at their limits, silly as that was. I did eventually get to dive the oil rigs with an all-GUE boat--yay! But when my buddy and I were going over the dive plan, I forgot and said I was comfortable with 110 feet, and he gently reminded me the limit was 100 feet without trimix. It's not like I was missing anything in those last ten feet, but *c'mon.* Later that day my buddy and another guy he'd done Fundies with were laughing and reminiscing over how, after their course was over, their instructor had "caught" them solo diving (or same-ocean-buddy diving, I guess) and they were so sheepish! And my internal "c'mon!" gained an expletive. I later took the solo and deep courses, and still haven't done Fundies Part 2, though I also haven't ruled it out.

I don't know exactly what's next for me and my diving. I'm having a lot of fun doing mostly advanced recreational dives, in gear that's mostly DIR-compliant (no spare mask or wet notes, computer not in gauge mode, and I do bring a pony to solo dive.) I like caverns and might like caves. I dig wrecks and know there are lots more at depths that require helium and deco stops. Part of me thinks that, if I want to go there, I should go back to GUE. Part of me thinks maybe I should just stay where I am, and keep enjoying my hobby instead of having to work so hard at it. Part of me thinks I'd still like to learn more about what they do and why, and keep reassessing my choices individually in light of my growing knowledge and experience. Maybe over time, I'll decide to become more gooey, whether or not I ever finish the course.

So that's my crazy-long answer to why I won't just make up my goddamn mind and either go full GUE or leave those nice people alone already. You did ask, OP.
 
I find it interesting that people want to stifle conversation/analysis of their preferred agency. For example, under I2I, there is (or was?) a forum reserved for only active instructors for a specific agency.

I don't understand why people need safe spaces. I find it interesting that it happens at both ends of the quality spectrum.

I think you are conflating two different things - one is asking questions about why something is done a certain way within DiR. The other is people repeatedly providing non-DiR answers despite being told (politely) that this is the DiR forum - which serves to confuse others who honestly want to know what the proper DiR answer is.

I hope you can appreciate why the former is fully welcome whereas the latter is not.
 
I hope you can appreciate why the former is fully welcome whereas the latter is not.
Sure okay. I've got better things to worry about. That's what I use the ignore button for. I don't use it only for people with whom I've had regreattable bickerfests. Some people say some pretty stupid shyt. If I went to correct them, I'd get into more bickerfests. No thanks. Had too many of those.
 
GUE also has a somewhat thorned history around leadership who is no longer with GUE, I think he might've been kicked out. Apparently George Irvine was known for ruffling feathers and being crass or brash or rude with his opinions. This is what I've gathered from hearsay and some old articles out there.
So far as I know, George Irvine was never part of GUE.

GUE also isn't cheap, the tech/cave classes are a big chunk of change, so that's also an obstacle for some.
People don’t think twice to spend $1K on a dive computer. Have that same diver buy a $200 bottom timer and spend the rest on a fundies. I promise you, that diver will be much better off not only the day they finish fundies but for the rest of their diving career. Long after that $1k dive computer would have been obsolete.

I'd say it's not as easy to schedule a GUE class either because the instructors are often booked months out, and often only take 2 students at a time.
Dude, what? Ever single GUE class I have taken (4) has had 3 participants.

Coincidentally, I was on Meredith’s website today (as I am on the big island this week and was wondering if she was in town). She has openings next month and the month after.

It doesn't seem as easy as signing up for the typical 4-8 person class elsewhere. I had to reach out to a dozen instructors to find one that could work me into a fundies class within the next two months, and from those available one was in another country.

All that said, I can't wait for Tech 1, just after my Doubles Primer, and Drysuit Primer, and maybe Rec 2 or 3...
Its easier to get a class together if you and two of your friends are trying to set it up.
 
Sure okay. I've got better things to worry about. That's what I use the ignore button for. I don't use it only for people with whom I've had regreattable bickerfests. Some people say some pretty stupid shyt. If I went to correct them, I'd get into more bickerfests. No thanks. Had too many of those.

Yeah, that fixes the issue of it being annoying for you. But the problem is, someone else will come into this forum and see the non-DiR answers. I mean, how is someone who is uninitiated, supposed to work out what the good answers are from what is siht? I mean this thread alone is polluted with talk about two deco bottles on deep air dives, 80%, CCR before OC trimix. So on and so on. If this forum is to be of any value, we have to put some effort in making sure the answers are DiR. Else, what is the point?
 
Back in the day I got this book,
View attachment 724931
I really did enjoy it and learned alot,
wish I had read it before or soon after my OW course ,

Would I take a course... maybe, but probably not,
Expense, time, and GUE is more my way or the hwy,,

I would rather read about it
And figure it out myself, and understand why, by doing it.

I also solo dive and and am self taught.
Most things I do are not necessary conventional, I guess being German background makes me a bit stubborn...

DiR diving is diametrically opposed to notion of solo diving. It is all about team. Standardized gear, gas, procedures, etc. Solo diving, by definition, you assume that you are on your own and have to carry all kinds of redundancy that you would not need if you were diving in a team. You don’t need a pony bottle if you have a dive buddy. You don’t take your BC off for any reason when you have a buddy because they can see and fix you the parts of your gear that you cannot access. Heck, even a long hose is pointless if you are a solo diver.

There are individual skills you can learn from DiR diving (eg. propulsion techniques) but those are not unique to DiR.
 
https://www.shearwater.com/products/teric/
http://cavediveflorida.com/Rum_House.htm

Back
Top Bottom