Good post.
Don't be obsessed with NDL, it is tangential to the conservatism as it depends on the ascent rate, whether the programmer takes the ascent into account and which limit to saturation they choose.
I suggest you set the perdix to any value, then dive the other one to NDL but do the stops the perdix gives you. Then you will be confident that your risk is the same as before but get used to doing stops. You may find that those stops are very short when you actually get to them.
Don't be obsessed with NDL, it is tangential to the conservatism as it depends on the ascent rate, whether the programmer takes the ascent into account and which limit to saturation they choose.
I suggest you set the perdix to any value, then dive the other one to NDL but do the stops the perdix gives you. Then you will be confident that your risk is the same as before but get used to doing stops. You may find that those stops are very short when you actually get to them.
Last edited: