Pensacola Update - 21 May 2010

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Scubatech has been using the boat from Crestview in place of theirs. Was surprised to see that notice, as they did not have a boat for this Sat or Sun as of Sunday afternoon.

correct. Last week they "were" pushing customers to the Crestview shop boat.

Actually I'm not surprised to see them change that notice.... I figured that once Memorial Day came up and they could get full charters with the start of summer, they would cancel their BP contract and start running real charters again.
 
I'm sure there is more profit to be made b keeping the boat in port and drawing a check from BP...
 
Does anyone think BP really needs these boats or do you think they have identified those that might be most affected by lost business and "buying them off" in advance?

It's clearly a "buy off in advance". (not in regards to just Scubatech, but all boat captains, including fishing charter captains).

BP would end up paying them for lost business anyway, so why not pay them up front and keep the boat captains/owners from rioting on TV and bashing BP.


but I can't really blame captains/owners for taking the check when there are no customers there.... (seeing how the oil spill scared half the customers off anyway).

(the way they are figuring paying them is showing bookings for that day/week for the past three years and paying averages for that time period over the past three years).



a month ago, before this spill, you were on the beach you'd you'd see 200 fishing boats over the course of a day. this past week, you'd be lucky to see 3 to 5 a day and most of them smaller non-charter boats.

most any boat that was big enough to be a charter boat, stayed in port. You go down to the Harbor, and the marinas were full of boats sitting there. Much easier and more profitable to "take the check" and not have to work for it.


Just frustrating for anyone who's paid to come on vacation and to see boat captains rather wanting to "get my BP check" instead of taking customers out. :shakehead:




This is still killing business along the coast regardless. Even though the beaches are clear, people are canceling vacation rentals, canceling weddings planned on the beach etc.

but the big problem is that even though some people are still coming, the phones have stopped ringing at the reservation desks for trips later in the year. People just aren't calling/reserving future trips. it's going to kill the local economies down there that depend on the travel dollar.
 
Meh

Seems as though they're turning people away, there's a few instances of that in this thread. I would say ScubaBoard is only a small sampling of divers in the big scheme of things, so I'd assume they are turning lots of people away.



If their immediate needs are more excessive than their typical income, shame on them.
 
Meh

Seems as though they're turning people away, there's a few instances of that in this thread. I would say ScubaBoard is only a small sampling of divers in the big scheme of things, so I'd assume they are turning lots of people away.

The thing is when the oil is cleaned up (relatively speaking) and the BP money dries up, the tourism isn't going to instantly resume. Then when the ops are facing an extended period of diminished revenue while tourism slowly gets restored, they are going to want "lost business" revenue from BP. But those claims will ring hollow when BP introduces a long line of those people testifying they wanted to go fishing and diving but the ops turned them away.

That's assuming BP isn't requiring boat operators to sign a release in the first place.
 
The thing is when the oil is cleaned up (relatively speaking) and the BP money dries up, the tourism isn't going to instantly resume. Then when the ops are facing an extended period of diminished revenue while tourism slowly gets restored, they are going to want "lost business" revenue from BP. But those claims will ring hollow when BP introduces a long line of those people testifying they wanted to go fishing and diving but the ops turned them away.

the business won't instantly return. The condo bookings are WAY down. Beach wedding booking for new events are "non existent". Restaurants will lay off staff, etc... this extends a lot further than the dive industry.


but I have noticed on the local news on the gulf coast that BP has "Public Affairs" representatives in place for any issue to give TV Interviews to put that "BP Shine-o-la" on it.... they seem to try to gloss over stuff in the interviews... (as expected).

That's assuming BP isn't requiring boat operators to sign a release in the first place.

They had to sign a contract with BP or someone saying they wouldn't go out on charters and would remain in port "on call" in case they were needed to lay boom.
 
In the Pensacola area:

Doug on the "H2O Below" is still running charters 7 days a week as long he gets 4 or more divers to go - he's dropped his minimum to help get folks out.

Dr. Dive, Y-knot, and the Wet Dream, are still running trips as well.
 

Back
Top Bottom