- Messages
- 10,951
- Reaction score
- 4,148
- # of dives
- None - Not Certified
We dove the Odyssey. It was a fun dive.
Happy that somebody else was thinking this and said so! I agree wholeheartedly.
There are a number of reasons that this wreck has fallen off the list for many North/West dive ops. Dive with the ones who will still go there!
- It was always a deep dive at 110fsw, but when she was newly sunk and intact, higher structures allowed for slightly shallower profiles.
- The attraction for many divers is when "a wreck" looks more like a recognizable ship. It takes a lot of diving before one can begin to see beyond shapes and look for opportunistic niche creatures that lurk in plain sight. When it becomes a pile of rubble, most divers lose interest. Their loss, but the dive-op knows what sells... it's a forrest for the trees kind of perceptual issue.
- The Odyssey wreck is at the far Eastern range of most North/West dive operators. Gas is an issue, and there are closer dives sites and a wreck (the Aquila), as well. For a lot of social/business-dynamics reasons, the mooring system takes a major beating, even leaving the rougher weather out of the equation.
Here is a good reference for the Wrecks of Roatan: Roatan wreck scuba diving - history - information
With a careful read (between the lines), you will see similar sentiments as mine.
There is an incredible "placed" wreck on Roatan that no-one really dives. It was sunk in a rather haphazard placement just behind (North of) Frenck Key. The waters are dark and murky, even though she is shallower than the North side wrecks. It would be a great dive for a truly advanced diver, not referring to simple possession of the c-card. There are two other more "natural" South side wrecks in that same category.
Look beyond structure, both natural reef and man-made. Utilize it instead to look for the creatures that are using what remains there to their unique advantage. It's all in the details.