next discussion:
the 120 rule...

For some reason, the older I get, the less I'm interested in "risks"...
the 120 rule...

For some reason, the older I get, the less I'm interested in "risks"...
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
True, this will be the limiting factor for most divers. But some divers are actually trained to do this, so for the divers used to keeping a running track of average depth it is possible. For most divers, they would need at the very least a backup bottom timer that would keep track of the average depth.You are at depth when your computer fails. Where do you find your average depth?
And, with the really low cost of many modern PDC options, why bother?For most divers, they would need at the very least a backup bottom timer that would keep track of the average depth.
It won't be any Cressi, Mares and Suunto using RGBM.In my experience when diving with 2 or more computers which give different results, the most conservative computer, when in deco, clears upon ascent without a need for a stop.
Indeed.And, with the really low cost of many modern PDC options, why bother?
Yeah. I was trained to do this myself, as were my dive buddies in our UTD training group, including the ones who got bent after a dive in which their math on that calculation (and other parts of the dive) was not all that it should be. Call me crazy, but when I am on a NDL dive, I prefer to focus my attention on what I am seeing during the dive rather than doing a constant mathematical calculation of my average depth so that I will be prepared in case my computer goes bad (which has never happened).True, this will be the limiting factor for most divers. But some divers are actually trained to do this, so for the divers used to keeping a running track of average depth it is possible. For most divers, they would need at the very least a backup bottom timer that would keep track of the average depth.
Ditched the console for a brass&glass SPG clipped in at the hip, and keep the computer on my wrist.Query to the group whether ditching the console in favor of a lollipop SPG and backup computer is the right way to go?
Have you ever done a dive where the Surf GF never drops below 99? If not your horizons are narrow, which is fine, but you're ignoring how a lot of people enjoy their diving.No clue what this means but it sounds wrong.
I would recreate in SubSurface a profile that is close enough and see what the average depth is. You can always apply a safety factor to the calculated avg depth to be on the safer side.You are at depth when your computer fails. Where do you find your average depth?
don't go crazy about it just get an extra one and stuff it in your pocket. over the year i have a total of 3 computer. I bought a mares quad air 2 years ago and my back up is a mares m1 that i bought in 2006 ! I l also have a zoop that sit in a drawer.hey guys
so as i start to look into more tec and solo diving i got into the discusion on having a backup dive computer and got curious what peoples opinion were on it
in hopes of starting a helthy discusion why and why. not i wanted to ask what do you do dive
is it a overrated thing or is it most important thing in your kit mby its only used for dives below 30 meter or when a deco dive is intended?
- no backup computer
- with a cheep (sunto zoop or anything like that)
- diving the same computer for primary and backup
- using you old computer after upgrading
hope to here some of your guys thougt on the topic and learn some now things!