johndiver999
Contributor
yes and the fact that the op mentioned difficulty with a safety stop shows his unfamiliarity with the issue. Rather than a safety stop depth, a more critical issue is how to perform an ascent at the correct speed (without a computer).I'd actually say you're "under" thinking it in this particular scenario, as there are various options. In many places, you can see the surface, so judging safety stop depth isn't difficult. If vis is bad enough that you cannot see the surface, then you can deploy a DSMB -- your buoyancy will thank you for the visual reference and you can put a knot at 15 ft for depth info. There's also the near-certain probability that your buddy's depth gauge still works.
In the event of a computer failure (during a deep recreational dive) one might want to be able to deploy an smb from depth and then slowly wind themselves back up to the surface.
An smb on a reel or spool, provides a considerable degree of safety and can be very helpful in several "problem" situations.
When it comes to redundancy, the diver needs to carefully think about what kind of issues they will be able to handle (and which ones they won't - also ones they deem so unlikely that they are not worth worrying about).
The point is that this is a personal decision and the diver should be able to clearly justify their decisions (at least to themselves). Every single piece of redundant gear comes at a cost of added complexity and also an increase in the probability of a gear failure. It is not "maintain your gear and bring whatever you feel like".