So pretty much as I suspected. I understand why they went with the electronic lock, it is just some code that they have to write once, vs the physical lock required multiple machine operations to make. But I think if you make an electronic lock that won't get activated by being accidentally pressed or held down it becomes too complicated. I would rather pay the extra dollar or two for a physical lock.
To not incur a new set of manufacturing costs the lock could be electrically set to three quick pushes instead of one 3 second push. It would much harder to accidentally push three times in rapid succession. That is just a programing update. I too would prefer a physical lock, but some may argue that now it takes two hands to operate and that's a downside for some.