Addison Snyder
Contributor
Legitimate question: are these tables in any way superior to a plain ol' dive computer running a standard algorithm?
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Legitimate question: are these tables in any way superior to a plain ol' dive computer running a standard algorithm?
Not trying to shill for shearwater, but get yourself a perdix. Replace the battery using a coin and a AA battery in buttf*ck-nowhere.Yeah. The batteries never die and need replacing.
Legitimate question: are these tables in any way superior to a plain ol' dive computer running a standard algorithm?
LOL. You may be missing the point here. The point is NOT to argue tables versus computers, the point is to address a number of SB posts where people incorrectly used tables for multi-level dives.Not trying to shill for shearwater, but get yourself a perdix. Replace the battery using a coin and a AA battery in buttf*ck-nowhere.
Legitimate question: are these tables in any way superior to a plain ol' dive computer running a standard algorithm?
I don't think I ever said that. You may be misunderstanding a post about depths in a multilevel dive, in which case the levels must be deepest first. This is a limitation of the table/Wheel/eRDPml, not anything else.By the way I see that one post by Tursiops a chart that says repetitive depths are limited by the previous depth.
efx:Yeah. The batteries never die and need replacing.
Not trying to shill for shearwater, but get yourself a perdix. Replace the battery using a coin and a AA battery in buttf*ck-nowhere.