formula1mb@aol.com
Contributor
I understand the failure point idea but I personally think people tend to way oversimplify it, saying simply that less failure points = better reliability and superior design. The quality and likelihood of failure is even more important and can't be simply quanitified by saying a>b.
Good example is a jet engine versus simple piston engine in an airplane. The jet engine has many hundreds of turbine blades operating in a super hostile environment where if any one of them were to fail----the engine would go out of balance and fail in no time. A piston engine on the outside seems much simpler----a handful of big pistons, connecting rods, and valves compared to the many hundreds of parts in the jet engine. In real life though----jet engines have far superior reliability because of the design advantages creating less friction and wear, letting the engine have a lifetime of thousands of hours before overhaul relative to a piston that needs an overhaul every couple of hundred hours.
Looking at the i3, if the components are high quality and protected from the elements and less exposed---it could easily have superior reliability. Point is failure points is only a limited view of the system and time will tell.
Robert
Good example is a jet engine versus simple piston engine in an airplane. The jet engine has many hundreds of turbine blades operating in a super hostile environment where if any one of them were to fail----the engine would go out of balance and fail in no time. A piston engine on the outside seems much simpler----a handful of big pistons, connecting rods, and valves compared to the many hundreds of parts in the jet engine. In real life though----jet engines have far superior reliability because of the design advantages creating less friction and wear, letting the engine have a lifetime of thousands of hours before overhaul relative to a piston that needs an overhaul every couple of hundred hours.
Looking at the i3, if the components are high quality and protected from the elements and less exposed---it could easily have superior reliability. Point is failure points is only a limited view of the system and time will tell.
Robert