Jag, not all North Americans like the high-roller fancy schmancy tourism. The reason why they can afford the fancy schmancy stuff is because airfare (from major US cities) is dirt cheap to any Caribbean, Mexican, Belizean, and Bahamas destinations. Also, travel time is kept to a bare minimum given the limited time they have for vacations. So their expenses just even out. I would say that the average North American would go for something like Atlantis Resorts in the Philippines. Some or a lot I should say, who have a little more time in their hands prefer even more modest accomodations and backpack-style travelling. After gathering and digesting all the feedback on this thread, I do not expect to get a lot of North Americans to visit the Philippines simply for the reasons that I recently summarized in this thread but maybe a few more.
The thing is that if we can increase the number of visitors from North America then it would be great for our tourism industry. We are already heavily promoting tourism in Europe, might as well use the same formula and try to attract visitors from North America. Doesn't really hurt to do it.
Phil
The thing is that if we can increase the number of visitors from North America then it would be great for our tourism industry. We are already heavily promoting tourism in Europe, might as well use the same formula and try to attract visitors from North America. Doesn't really hurt to do it.
Phil
let's chum the water even more...
DO we want more american/ north american tourism? i mean, reading the previous posts (and save for those willing to "backpack it" like david, ben, hank and a few more) it appears that many american tourists really prefer the high-roller fancy schmancy tourism destinations more associated with the carribean, jamaica, mexico...
so why fight it? if it's cheaper for joe to fly to belize than manila why force him over here?