A buddy told me about this thread very soon after I posted my blog entry (referenced above).
A couple of points NOT expanded on or explained fully in my blog, but relevant to some questions asked here.
First is that aluminum has a completely different response to steel when it is filled... unlike steel tanks which reach a point of reduced elasticity and stays AT THAT POINT for "ever", the reduction in aluminum's ability to expand without failure CONTINUES TO be reduced and will eventually result in fatigue (this is an oversimplification but gets the point across). I am aware the number of fills that an aluminum cylinder can endure is in the order of 10^5 (a million). However, that is absolutely contingent on the manufacturer's rated pressure. A metallurgist explained to me that overfilling an aluminum cylinder reduces that number "exponentially." I didn't ask for specifics but she said it could be several orders of magnitude with constant fills to 250 bar (about 3600 psi). That worries me. I try to make sure my students worry about it too.
I mentioned in the blog that I even Eddy Current new cylinders... I am aware of the false negatives reported and associated with this practice...
I am also aware that my practice of selling cylinders after about six or seven years is conservative... I do so out of concern for the buyer... and because I can afford to be cautious.
When I teach a VIP course, I tell participants that in the final analysis, if they would not be comfortable sitting on a tank as it is being filled, they should not pass it. Ridiculously conservative? Possibly. But I would like to see all cylinders filled in containment stations. Odd perhaps, but I'm okay with that label.
Finally, I have been made aware of a rash of aluminum cylinders in oxygen service going tits-up. I have seen divers throw deco bottle around like sandbags. Not a good practice. Be careful.