I use a computer as a back-up to my brain, not a substitute.
First, let's draw a distinction between recreational and decompression diving, i.e., any dive requiring an obligatory deco stop. For me, the difference is in the level of planning. If I were to plan a dive with the potential for mandatory decompression stops, the profile would be clearly defined beforehand (in my case using DCEIM tables) and I would stick to it. In the event that the profile deviated from the plan -- and even if it didn't -- I'd still like a computer with me to add another layer of safety, just in case I figured the deco stops wrong. Between the planned stop times and what the computer says, I would choose the most conservative.
The vast majority of my dives, however, are the relaxed recreational kind, virtually unplanned by comparison. Depending on the objective, I prefer to structure these dives as one long, slow ascent: I feel that's the safest way to dive in most circumstances (arguments pro or con?). This is where tables, even multi-level ones, bite the dust: they're just not designed for this type of diving. A computer overcomes this deficiency, but I recognize that the computer may not be perfect at it either, so I dive conservatively with a good understanding of its limitations. And in all cases, I take my bio-programmable common sense alarm unit that will supercede the computer if I detect anything wrong: my brain.
Originally posted by Uncle Pug
1. Dive computers Rot your brain....
If you mean to say that many people rely too heavily on them, then I agree. Otherwise I'll speak for myself. You seem like a smart guy, Uncle, do they rot YOUR brain? If you use dive planning software, you too are using a dive computer...
Cheers, g2
PS - BTW, a couple years ago I took the Emergency Dive Accident Management course out at USC/Catalina's Wrigley Marine Science Center. Talk about an eye opener! The course included some excellent presentations on the history of dive tables, computers and decompression models. Highly recommended.