fpsndiver:... because of the pavlovian, ingrained response to "save" them to avoid liability......screw liability.....as long as you can justify logically your response for not taking action in that situation, you may be sued, but I am doubtful that it would be successful.
I think I didn't make my point clear enough...
It's more on the line of what Tom725 said, rescuing a guy (even if that's putting oneself on the line) is more of a response to training than a response to the fear of being sued. I've been in that situation, and the last --LAST-- thing that comes to your mind is a lawyer. You're rescuing the guy not because you may be sued, you rescue the guy to avoid seeing him die like a dog.
But even this is not the whole story, because, as I said in my previous post, in the heat of the situation you assess everything and you find yourself capable of handling it. Guys, these accidents seldom happen when you are at 60' and the soon-to-be-victim is at 300'. That surely will be an easy decision. No. These things happen when you are at 100', and the other guy is at 115'. Sinking fast? maybe, but when you think of the guy dying, those 15' are "spitting distance" (add narcosis, and you'll have a powerful "I got to save this guy" cocktail).
gangrel441:I sympathize for DMs who have been hurt in either type of incident, as no matter how you look at it, it is a selfless act. I just think sometimes the tough decisions being made are not the right decisions.
I totally agree with both assertions. It is a selfless act; and it's probably not the right one. But think about what I've said about whatching passively somebody die, and about what Tom725 (too much Toms in this thread! ) said of conditioned response, that shall give you a new insight into the problem.
Happy bubbles,
Gio