Which do you think is less dangerous at 160ft? Open-circuit air or CCR trimix?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

People should have a look at some videos of Buford Spring a straight in and out free diving cavern that some need a CCR+trimix. Plenty on YouTube
Few of us are going to do that probably, but I think you can embed videos here using the 'media' tag if you want

Screenshot 2025-02-06 at 13.00.55.png
 
what is your point anyways? your location says ireland so i assume you never plan to dive at buford but i would imagine those who frequent north florida would like it to remain open. unnecessary deaths put that at risk
My point is while I understand people love their rebreathers and want to get as much use out of them as possible ( so would I if I spent that much money) but it’s overkill in a 50m cavern. I would do the dive on a twin set of air. I’d cycle to the supermarket, I wouldn’t bring a 3ltr four wheel drive, yes I’d be safer in four wheel drive. It’s a mind set.
 
My point is while I understand people love their rebreathers and want to get as much use out of them as possible ( so would I if I spent that much money) but it’s overkill in a 50m cavern. I would do the dive on a twin set of air. I’d cycle to the supermarket, I wouldn’t bring a 3ltr four wheel drive, yes I’d be safer in four wheel drive. It’s a mind set.
The trouble with cycling to the market is that it would take 4 trips to get everything home. When the market is miles away it would turn a 45 minute chore into a full day. Ice cream would melt before I get home in the summer as well.

There is also the simplicity of not owning a separate vehicle for every task. The 4-wheel drive V6 SUV may not be the perfect grocery store vehicle, nor the perfect commuter to work, but a pretty good choice for hauling the dive gear to the beach entry site. Just having a single vehicle that does it all instead of a fleet of single task vehicles.
 
The trouble with cycling to the market is that it would take 4 trips to get everything home. When the market is miles away it would turn a 45 minute chore into a full day. Ice cream would melt before I get home in the summer as well.

There is also the simplicity of not owning a separate vehicle for every task. The 4-wheel drive V6 SUV may not be the perfect grocery store vehicle, nor the perfect commuter to work, but a pretty good choice for hauling the dive gear to the beach entry site. Just having a single vehicle that does it all instead of a fleet of single task vehicles.
I understand you may look on this as blasphemy, but why use a V6 SUV on the occasion that you can walk or cycle.
 
I understand you may look on this as blasphemy, but why use a V6 SUV on the occasion that you can walk or cycle.
I don't want to spend a day making the 4 trips I would need.
I don't live within a reasonable walking distance to a store.
Weather conditions (severe heat) would make walking or cycling a dangerous activity.

You are lucky that you are close enough to a store that you can walk/cycle. Your buying habits appear to be small enough that you can carry what you buy that distance. You don't live, work, shop where I do.
 
I understand you may look on this as blasphemy, but why use a V6 SUV on the occasion that you can walk or cycle.
I imagine most ccr divers with a decent amount of open circuit tech diving experience would agree that the ccr is not the right choice for every dive. I still think 160 on air at Buford is a poor choice tho
 
I imagine most ccr divers with a decent amount of open circuit tech diving experience would agree that the ccr is not the right choice for every dive.
Yep, when multiple options are "safe enough", that decision should consider other aspects: cost, logistics (gas availability, fills for tomorrow's dives, etc.), and of course, whether any beers will be left after teardown!
 
I haven’t heard of a single case of someone dying at 60m or less because of narcosis.
It has been a while since I watched this, bust as an engineer, I remember disagreeing what the the conclusion from the statistics as presented.
 
I remember disagreeing what the the conclusion from the statistics as presented.
Yeah, similar # of fatalities, but the number of divers (and therefore, # of dives) has vastly increased. Using their numbers, I'd ballpark a 30% reduction in the fatality rate on CCR.
 

Back
Top Bottom