Where the buck stops...

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I have shown you what to do Clayjar, you are refusing to accept the fact that your evaluation could be as much of the problem as your assistance. You set up multiple "straw men" in your arguements, complete with their responses to the given situation. My earlier point being to stick to exactly the situation in the article because as I earlier said, anything can be "straw manned" in any direction as I just showed you. Your attempt to enlighten on how you would evade or what would protect you doesn't change anything other than to make it clear that you, rescue diver or not, have decided you have now attained the level of *evaluator* complete with ways to protect yourself, and even somehow help the person without really helping (IE ascending so hes closer to the surface when he finally passes out I assume) in the event someone challenges your *evaluation*. Worse statistically this would go down in the diver attempts to help other diver and they both drown column more than likely...(assuming of course that he actually caught you and overpowered you, which I am certain would never happen)

Whos the jerk? The guy screaming foul, when people attempt to *evaluate* themselves out of being human, or the guy listing all the reasons why evaluation is actual saving more lives then it takes? Maybee you need a rescue course to determine whether or not to be human, I don't. Heres another straw man for you to ponder; your a soldier another soldier goes down under heavy fire, do you grab him and attempt to pull him to safety, while your still being shot at or do you let him go since well frankly, you have evaluated you stand a greater risk of being shot by helping him? I mean you dont know him, hes not your buddy, hell he didnt even ask you for help? Did your answer change? Of course not, your too smart for that...
 
Twiddles:
I have shown you what to do Clayjar, you are refusing to accept the fact that your evaluation could be as much of the problem as your assistance.
*Your* evaluation could be as much of the problem as *your* assistance. *You* are inexperienced and untrained. I am certainly nowhere near the skill level of the experienced divers, divemasters, and instructors on these forums, but I have studied extensively, practiced considerably, and trained religiously to recognize problems, preferably before they become uncontrollable.

Is it possible that I would believe a diver is irrational and dangerously panicking when they are in control? Yes, there may be, and that scares the hell out of me, which is why I work so hard. The better I am as a diver and potential rescuer, the more situations I will consider within my ability.

As of today, if I saw a panicked diver on the bottom on my main sites (which are all 80' or less), I'd go to him even knowing the danger. I trust my training and skills to be able to win a wrestling match, and I have three regulators I can go to. On the other hand, if I'm on nitrox on the Oriskany, and a diver in distress rushes past me down past the deck toward the bottom, to follow would be my death.

If you haven't taken nitrox yet, you probably aren't familiar with oxygen toxicity, but basically the results would be that I'd chase him down, and well before reaching him on the bottom, the high oxygen partial pressures would overload my central nervous system and send me into convulsions, at which point I would go unconscious, my regulator would fall out of my mouth, and I would drown. On air, the narcosis would be pronounced, and I'd be almost certain to be bent on ascent (unless some tech divers had spare deco they could drop for me), but I could probably be airlifted to a chamber and recover. On nitrox, oxtox and you're dead, and no chamber will help.

I'll put myself in danger for a diver in distress, and I'm trained to be as effective as possible when attempting a rescue scenario, but there *are* some cases when it *can* come down to throwing your life away with no chance to help. That would be stupid. (Note that this is not at all a "straw man argument" -- if you take the nitrox class, you'll find out that oxtox is nothing to be trifled with.)

Twiddles:
Your attempt to enlighten on how you would evade or what would protect you doesn't change anything other than to make it clear that you, rescue diver or not, have decided you have now attained the level of *evaluator* complete with ways to protect yourself, and even somehow help the person without really helping (IE ascending so hes closer to the surface when he finally passes out I assume) in the event someone challenges your *evaluation*.
I *am* a Rescue diver, and yes, I *have* attained the level of "evaluator". Frankly, that was at least half of our Rescue class. "The best rescue is the one that never happens." The whole point of your training is to find ways to break the chain of events before an incident develops or becomes an accident. If your rescue skills are called on, you have to act on your training and evaluate how to best help the diver in distress, assuming you can.

If you see a diver caught on the bottom in a net, flailing for all he's worth, do you swim right up to him? If you do, will you get entangled in the same net? Do you try to get his attention and calm him down so you can cut him out? If you can't calm him down, is there a way to cut the net enough to free him (or free the net so he can ascend with it) without becoming entangled? What would you do? We discussed that one at length, and let me tell you, none of us liked any of the answers very much. Perhaps you could restrain him enough to let your buddy approach and cut the net... but what if he *is* your buddy? What if you've tried and tried to free him, but you finally go out of air? Do you keep trying until you pass out and die yourself, or do you eventually give up and save the only one of you that you can? If you've given all you can, used all your air, and exhausted all your options, does giving up instead of dying make you a bad person? *Should* you stay there and die, even if you're not entangled?

In any rescue situation, successful or unsuccessful, you can be certain you will be second guessed. The result my instructors have seen most often is anger at the rescuer from the person they just rescued. ("I was fine! You owe me a weight belt!" they said one person argued after they had to jump off the boat to save him from drowning.) You don't do rescues to be thanked, and while they tell you that as long as you follow your training, eventually you'll win the lawsuits if anyone files them, frankly, none of that matters. During a rescue attempt, the only things that matter are the lives and health of the people involved.

Twiddles:
Whos the jerk? The guy screaming foul, when people attempt to *evaluate* themselves out of being human, or the guy listing all the reasons why evaluation is actual saving more lives then it takes? Maybee you need a rescue course to determine whether or not to be human, I don't.
Have you ever been near an actual successful rescue? Have you ever been near an actual *unsuccessful* rescue attempt? Have you ever been sitting there, powerless, while EMTs work on someone while knowing there was *nothing* you could do? Have you ever spent sleepless nights wondering if you could've done something different to prevent it? Have you ever thought that perhaps *you* caused it because earlier that day they had been doing something you loved? Does finally coming to the understanding that sometimes you *can't* do anything make you *less* human? Does the pain you carry for the rest of your life mean you're a subhuman monster? Does taking up diving and realizing that, although you want to save *everyone* and never feel that loss again, there may come a time when you have to accept that you might not be able to save everyone mean you're a jerk?

If it does, you, sir, are the Mother Theresa reincarnated, and I am the spawn of silt. If, on the other hand, the fact that I've expanded my training and experience as much as possible to *try* to *never* be in a situation where I can't help, means that I'm doing all I can while still knowing full well as I learn more and more that there *can* be a time when everything fails me... well, then perhaps I'm human after all.

Twiddles:
Heres another straw man for you to ponder; your a soldier another soldier goes down under heavy fire, do you grab him and attempt to pull him to safety, while your still being shot at or do you let him go since well frankly, you have evaluated you stand a greater risk of being shot by helping him? I mean you dont know him, hes not your buddy, hell he didnt even ask you for help? Did your answer change? Of course not, your too smart for that...
A rescue diver is not a soldier. I have never been a soldier, and I will not insult soldiers by assuming what I see on TV shows is who they are. If any of them want to reply to a troll such as yourself, that is their decision and theirs alone.
 
Twiddles:
your a soldier another soldier goes down under heavy fire, do you grab him and attempt to pull him to safety, while your still being shot at or do you let him go since well frankly, you have evaluated you stand a greater risk of being shot by helping him? I mean you dont know him, hes not your buddy, ...
This wasn't appointed to me, but what the heck!
It's allways good to have something btw you and the fire. In this case a brother in arms covering your ******:D It kind of helps if you really don't know him at all, and if you both succeed alive you get medal and all the praises:eyebrow:

guerilla seargent:bigun2:
 
Sorry you took offense, obviously you dislike being *evaluated* as much as I do. I dislike being insulted as much as you do and yet for some reason you seem to cling to this belief that some class you took somehow makes you more capable and thus gives you more latitude in the specific situation described in the article or in the dozen other straw men you created, it doesn't. Your an armchair quarterback with a thousand theories and an online coaching degree. You dont evaluate a crisis you respond to it (umm in case you hadn't noticed were kinda past the prevention portion of todays excercise). A crisis changes, it morphs, it twists and turns, save your evaluation (of both your response and his lack of intelligence) for the deck of the boat after you responded, you might save a life. Keeping in mind that we are still attempting to talk about a guy who swam up to you and simply asked you for air, before you began your 10 point safety *evaluation* on the risk and implications of your actions in any given situation for a man out of air approaching you without the proper credentials for a diver in distress..............Christ I hope I am never waiting on your *** to save me.

Stick to teaching people to respond in a similar manner in a similar situation and you will have half the battle beaten (hmm I wonder if thats why buddy breathing, and air sharing are taught by so many agencies in such similar ways?). OR Let me die and see how I respond when you have given me no other choice. Finally, I was a soldier and believe it or not in alot of cases soldiers for some stupid *** reason emulate what they think they should do based upon TV shows. The point was that a soldier wouldn't evaluate or at least a live one wouldn't. He would respond and deal with whatever choice he made however he could.
 
ClayJar, and others, thank you for your well rounded and informative responses that you have given. It has benifited me a lot and I am pretty sure that it has benifited a lot of other divers also.

Twiddles, the statement that you have under you name, "problem child", says a lot about you and after reading your post I would have to agree with it, so I think you should give it a rest and learn from what has been said by the experienced and respected divers on this board.
 
TheWetRookie, I am glad you have learned alot from the posted thread. I am currently in some disagreement with Clayjars negative comments to me and his overall melodramatic comments regarding carrying pain for the rest of your life and mother theresa and spawn of silt. Actually that was a bit frightening sort of where have you gone Clay thing hit me. I am not sure where problem child comes into play or which post I made that indicated to you that I was one.

I have been told I have a rather black and white attitude towards things I tend to cut through bs like a hot knife through butter. If you believe my comments are inaccurate I would love to have your opinion. Earlier you seemed to agree now something has changed your mind, mind if I ask what it was? I have simply been trying to keep things in line with what was stated in the article, about a specific statement and about whether or not it was correct for Dive Training to agree. All this other baggage was added by Clayjar and others *of experience* to bolster IMHO confusion of whether or not Marty was a toad or an incitefull individual we should all aim to be more like. I understand the other point of the article being that we should be aware of issues where blind assistance could also mean killing yourself. I simply believe that THIS INSTANCE isn't debateable.
 
Twiddles:
your a soldier another soldier goes down under heavy fire, do you grab him and attempt to pull him to safety, while your still being shot at or do you let him go since well frankly, you have evaluated you stand a greater risk of being shot by helping him? I mean you dont know him, hes not your buddy, hell he didnt even ask you for help?
I was trained as a combat medic at the end of the Viet Nam conflict. My time with the military ended after Desert shield/ Desert storm running a surgical intensive care unit. In between the two events I spent time training a lot of medics and medical related personnel. The one lesson that was drummed into our heads and that I continued to drum into others was----"a dead medic is no damn use to anyone". A medic who would foolishly waste his life is not an asset to his team.

The scenario you created---you let the downed soldier go until such time as the fire fight ends or sufficient covering firepower allows you a reasonable chance to try and save his life. During that time the guy may well die.

Such situations need not be restricted to war zone either. The Lexington Ky fire dept lost a person not long ago when she went to the aid of an injured person and a gunman shot her.
 
Twiddles:
All this other baggage was added by Clayjar and others *of experience* to bolster IMHO confusion of whether or not Marty was a toad or an incitefull individual we should all aim to be more like. I understand the other point of the article being that we should be aware of issues where blind assistance could also mean killing yourself. I simply believe that THIS INSTANCE isn't debateable.
Mr Snyderman was just stating an obvious possibility in response to a hypothetical situation.

This instance is obviously debatable:D :coffee:
 
I don't have time to read all the responses in the thread right now but I wanted to drop a quick response.

As has been pointed out none of is obligated to sacrifice ourselves for another diver and if you do, it really doesn't qualify as a rescue. Here is the kicker though, I feel that if I do agree to dive with someone that I do have a measure of responsibility in whatever happens on the dive.

The first line of defense here is making good decision about when, where and how to dive. I've been on charters where half the diver come back just about OOA and the other half are OOA. Now, I avoid the type of charters where those things tend to happen. I know that on a busy day at the local dive site there are plenty of divers who appear to be doing their best to get themselves killed. I no longer find that a fun place to be and just avoid the situation from the start...problem solved before I ever leave my home. Why wait til your in the water watching the poor sucker die?

I don't dive in packs. I dive with the buddies I choose to dive with. I guess if you dive in a pack, then the whole pack are your buddies. If you don't know anything about those people or their diving skill then shame on you.

In general, I just try real hard to avoid those diving situations that are more like a three ring circus...which means that I pass up on a lot of resort type diving situations.

Should I just happen upon an unknown diver who got themself in a jam, I'd likely try to lend a hand. I've had to deal with a few paniced divers under water and I lived. To be honest, if you don't have some degree of confidence in your ability to do this, you might want to be VERY selective about the diving you do until you get better.
 

Back
Top Bottom