We are saying the same thing. At the low end nobody beats a gopro however you cannot do miracles with it.
If you want the ability to shoot difference scenes and have better quality image you need to spend money.
So step one is the gopro that once you add all extras actually costs $550 for a hero2
The next step to do some macro is at more than double the price around $1200 for something like an Olympus TG-1 with an epoque 1000 lumens and a wide angle
An LX7 with two solas 1200 and a dome plus a wide costs $2600 with an ike housing
I am not sure how to measure the value of being able to shoot different things at higher quality and if that is worth more or less than $650 for some people it is not for others it is, it depends entirely on what kind of interests you have and how much money you have
However to say that something that is lower quality compares to something that is clearly better and is not worth spending the money because you don't have it or don't want to spend it does not mean that the two options are really comparable, this is highly subjective but again the question was what would I be disappointed with a gopro requires an honest assessment of that a gopro set up does better
I think backscatter who produce an housing and filter for the gopro have nailed it down
The GoPro is a great system for the novice shooter who wants to start taking video and pictures underwater, and doesn't want to fuss with settings or lugging a bulky system around...The Magic Filter can help restore color to your footage at depths of 5-30 feet, but below that, a light is essential equipment.
Pros
Most inexpensive underwater HD camera system on the market today
Wide angle lens a standard feature
Magic Filter restores color and contrast in the right conditions 5-30 feet
Cons
No manual controls
No ability to connect a strobe* not relevant to our purposes
Video quality not as good compared to higher end cameras, especially in low light
If you want the ability to shoot difference scenes and have better quality image you need to spend money.
So step one is the gopro that once you add all extras actually costs $550 for a hero2
The next step to do some macro is at more than double the price around $1200 for something like an Olympus TG-1 with an epoque 1000 lumens and a wide angle
An LX7 with two solas 1200 and a dome plus a wide costs $2600 with an ike housing
I am not sure how to measure the value of being able to shoot different things at higher quality and if that is worth more or less than $650 for some people it is not for others it is, it depends entirely on what kind of interests you have and how much money you have
However to say that something that is lower quality compares to something that is clearly better and is not worth spending the money because you don't have it or don't want to spend it does not mean that the two options are really comparable, this is highly subjective but again the question was what would I be disappointed with a gopro requires an honest assessment of that a gopro set up does better
I think backscatter who produce an housing and filter for the gopro have nailed it down
The GoPro is a great system for the novice shooter who wants to start taking video and pictures underwater, and doesn't want to fuss with settings or lugging a bulky system around...The Magic Filter can help restore color to your footage at depths of 5-30 feet, but below that, a light is essential equipment.
Pros
Most inexpensive underwater HD camera system on the market today
Wide angle lens a standard feature
Magic Filter restores color and contrast in the right conditions 5-30 feet
Cons
No manual controls
No ability to connect a strobe* not relevant to our purposes
Video quality not as good compared to higher end cameras, especially in low light