What will I be disappointed with a GoPro 3?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

Does not the new GP-3 Black have a manual white balance option?
Yes but not in the traditional sense. It has a few presets based on light temperature and a RAW setting (to where you can adjust it in post) but not the traditional "point the camera at something white and hit set". It also only works for video, not photo mode. The WB system is not well suited for underwater use.
 
Right now I'm sporting the new UK video light because it's insanely small and has an incredible beam spread (better I think than the Sola, but the Sola penetrates farther). For travel, ease of use and quality, it's great.

+1 for the Underwater Kinetics AquaLite. MY use for it is as a focus light for DSLR rig, HOWEVER, this little light is just bigger than a roll of quarters and is INSANE. I'm surprised this thing isn't getting more exposure. It's perfect for video, focus light for stills, and could arguably hold it's own as a dive torch. I've been demo-ing the 90 degree version (65 degree available) and is a very smooth 90 degree flood, with no hotspot(s), 4 brightness settings, 2 rechargeable batteries, rugged and very bright.
 
Last edited:
Kinetic Aqualite I saw maxs out at only 600 lumens the Sola 4000 will go from 800 to 4000 lumens.
 
4000 lumens scare the xxx out of fish practically not usable
With the amount of money ($3700 for lights and gopro) you would spend on those lights you can get yourself a panasonic LX7 or a Sonr RX100 in a nauticam housing and a few lenses and two solas 1200 if you want to do close up
This set up will perform much better than a gopro and won't be difficult to use, I can tell you because I have both camera check this

Wide angle (WB and filter) and super macro (sola 1200x2)
[youtubehq]DuCMkUyYiDE[/youtubehq]

Night dive with two sola 1200
[youtubehq]HN6t4c7JfDU[/youtubehq]

There is no way a gopro can perform like this in those conditions even if you take 10000 lumens in water

---------- Post added January 1st, 2013 at 02:27 PM ----------

Those are similar or same site in Raja Ampat with a Gopro hero2
[youtubehq]947TB_O4fUM[/youtubehq]

As they say you get what you pay for
 
Right off the bat it looks like there is a big difference in picture quality between the 3rd video shot with the gopro and the others.
 
I got a GP-3 (black) a week ago. This is some un-adjusted video shot with no lights and no filters in 80 feet of clear water... came out decent..Head mount is a little shaky... For part of it, I was nervous about sharks that i had seen.

[video=youtube;82CD8nw6R5U]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=82CD8nw6R5U&feature=share&list=UU1utDku8vJ RJYgBZImLyLJQ[/video]
 
This is some footage of a Panasonic TZ30/ZS20 without even a dome port done with little white balance and no filters I found on youtube

[youtubehq]mdGRSGwTDKA[/youtubehq]

[youtubehq]8rXQ4TNDHNg[/youtubehq]

If you use that camera properly and put a dome port you can see that this camera easily does better than the gopro and can do macro, still video capture only involve one push button and occasional white balance set

So if you are in the market for spending $550-650 definitely gopro but be aware of what you can get
If you can spend a bit more (the Panasonic with a dome and 1 video light would cost around $1350) then you have many more options
My Sony set up of the video costs around $3,500 at list price

The difference in quality shows of course proportional to the money you spend
 
Here is a little comparison by a friend of mine between a Hero3 Black and Sony Rx100 in Nauticam Housing.

[video=youtube;PLDv-B_42TQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=PLDv-B_42TQ[/video]

I dont think the GoPro is that terrible that it shouldn't be considered, price difference for the cameras and housing $1600 vs $399. Then add an extra $500+ for the wide angle lens for the Sony and the compared setup cost is $2100 vs $399 there.

Considering the price and size its pretty amazing what you can get out of the GoPro. To get a considerable jump up in end results your needing to pay many multiples of the price of the hero3 black and starting at something like the rx100 setup for $2100 and you can see the comparison above.

The GoPro is not a perfect camera thats for sure but it's a simple to use small camera setup that lets people get into UW video at a pretty good price point. If you learn to use it close to its potential the results can be quite good and well above anything else at even double its cost for camera and housing.

Here is one of my hero3 black videos to show what they can do and Im sure others could still do much better then I can.

 
Nobody has said that the GoPro is terrible the question is what will I be disappointed at.

Underwater video is a matter of skill and that night dive video you show is not really the best way to compare, however even in that case the gopro shows plenty of clipped highlight and blurred corners, the dynamic range just is not there because the sensor is smaller so it is true that there is a difference in price but it is also true that it shows to be honest. If you want to see what the RX100 can or not do is probably better to have a look at my night dive clip, majority of what is in there could not even be shot with a gopro as it is close range work.

The gopro is best suited for wide-angle ambient light shots to modest depths, as you go deeper the lack of custom white balance and the poor performance in low light shows the limits pretty soon. There are example clips on this thread of gopro with two sola light 1200 to shoot some daylight wide angle that could be achieved normally with a camera with custom white balance which would be actually cheaper than a gopro and two solas. Because the gopro does not have custom WB the already poor low light performance is made even worse by the fact that the filter absorbs light, so if with a normal compact you can push a filter at 20 meters and still looks good with a gopro it looks green and you need lights.

There are plenty of choices out there and the gopro is the choice as a start up kit, but you don't need to spend $2000+ to make an improvement.
A compact camera like a canon sx260 or a panasonic tz30 that can take macro costs you $1200-1400 including a focus light for close range work that with that set up you can do but you can't with a gopro

My sony rig costs over $3000 and so does my panasonic rig but the difference shows as you can see in mine and other videos, I have not had the chance to take any of my rigs into shallow water but I am pretty sure that the image quality will show. It also has to be noted that majority of 24mm compact camera only need a dome not a full wide lens to produce decent footage and because the CAN WB there is no need to be that close or have lights.

There are plenty of choices in the market but people don't know it because camera manufacturers also produce camcorders and do not to cannibalize their own market share so let the action camera people chip in

It is great that gopro exist to push the envelope no issues with that I recommend the camera myself to beginners in video but I make it clear that it cannot do macro and it really only good for blue water ambient light shots preferably above 18 meters, when someone then has pushed this to the limits and is thinking of spending $1500 on video light for a gopro I usually tell them to change set up because they can capture different types of scenes and behaviour that even with lights are not a possibility with an action camera today. It is of course entirely possible to spend money on lighting but then you really come to the point where you realize you need a different camera so you can keep the lights and then spend some more money on a better camera

To make it clear I love the gopro is a great little camera that I would give to my son to play in water but having the money I would not bother taking in water myself, one day when I will live close to a warm sea I will take all my rigs in water on the same dive for a true comparison!
 
Last edited:
Seeing as your 2 cheaper suggestions are 3 to 3 1/2 times the cost of the hero 3 black what I said you must agree with. You can't match a go pro 3 black with anything less then double its cost which would be $800.

Most beginners I think would be more disappointed with a bigger camera setup as spending $1200+ they will be expecting much more out of it and lack of experience will show with not great video. I can see many more people willing to spend $400 to get started and then move on if they feel they have put grown it for underwater use but still have it for all the extra things you can do with an action can. Sure there are accessories above that price but they apply to either setup and things such as trays and lights can be used even if the person moves on to a larger more expensive setup.

I'm not saying the rx100 is worse then the gopro just that many may not see it is 5 times better then the go pro if you consider price which along with size are the 2 main reasons people are using gopro's underwater.

Sure super macro isn't possible in a go pro but that's not what everyone wants an underwater video camera for and the cost of the dome port and a good macro lens alone for any decent camera, will be costing you well over $1000 in most cases if not double that just for that function. Your really looking at 2 very different markets here and what a user spending $400 will be disapointed with will be quite different to someone spending $1400+ will be as surely at that cost you will be expecting much more from the camera.

Regarding the thread topic the only reason I came into this thread is because you were just showing examples of other cameras rather then negatives of a gopro.

I think the 3 black is easily a much more useable underwater camera then all other models, mostly due to its pro tune mode and cam raw wb option that has easily let me get good web at depths to 30m in any water or light conditions. Using a filter adds colour on top of it but using the regular modes I agree they are only best in blue water and with a good filter as the web struggles in poorer conditions.

The auto white balance is very hit and miss in poor light, the battery life is also a bit too short especially if using the LCD screen.
 

Back
Top Bottom