Is that in case they get real sick and you have to head back, or for another reason?
Vaccines dramatically reduce the risk of infection: Coronavirus Disease 2019 . I only really want to be around vaccinated people at all, but of course I don't get to make that decision for everyone else, that's up to them.On the other side, what blows my mind is people wanting to be around only vaccinated people on a boat. In my opinion it makes no difference on whether covid will hop aboard.
It's true that if you flew halfway around the world to arrive at your LOB, you are likely to have acquired it during the travel. What's the very best solution to that problem? Obviously, vaccines and masks -- we would all be a lot safer if these mandates returned for flights.For most there would seem to be a much higher chance of acquiring it while traveling to the boat than before they leave home. As such the tests while they would get lucky sometimes, overall probably would miss or incorrectly diagnose more than they catch.
If you're trying to minimize your own chance of spreading the disease, tests are useful because covid is contagious 1-3 days before symptom onset. So it can help you to avoid spreading it before you would otherwise know. Test mandates, of course, are helpful because operators of things like airplanes and liveaboards don't have to trust their customers to be self-evaluate their symptoms, they can trust the test instead.If they are symptomatic in a boat they should be taking precautions to keep others from getting sick anynow, no matter the sickness. But I see no reason to test.
So regardless of the vaccination/testing requirements, if y'all showed up on a liveaboard, and a few days in realized that you were positive, you are saying that it wouldn't change your behavior at all? You wouldn't tell the people around you, you wouldn't wear a mask, you wouldn't try to limit your exposure to others, that sort of thing?