Well..... now I'm lost.
How do you guys know all this stuff??? It sure isn't in any of my dive manuals....(OW and AOW). Is this something you learn as dive master, instructor, or technical training?
I've had a lot of "interesting" dives.
Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.
Benefits of registering include
Well..... now I'm lost.
How do you guys know all this stuff??? It sure isn't in any of my dive manuals....(OW and AOW). Is this something you learn as dive master, instructor, or technical training?
And I sure wish I could see you do it. It would make the second time in my life I have seen a wheel used outside of a classroom. Good to know they were not all wasted!
Well..... now I'm lost.
How do you guys know all this stuff??? It sure isn't in any of my dive manuals....(OW and AOW). Is this something you learn as dive master, instructor, or technical training?
When you get back to your wheel, you can do another interesting exercise.
Do the same profile as a series of mini-dives with zero SI on the regular RDP. You will get the same results. All the wheel does differently is to add the the multi-level NDLs, add a bunch of rules about what are legal combinations of multilevels, and replaces the multiple rows of the SI credit table with just the one line.
The PADI NDL is 55 minutes at 60', but the MDL is only 46 minutes. The profile I described would exceed the MDL, and also would violate the rules of the PADI wheel because the next valid level shallower than 120' is 80'. And the next valid level above 80' is 60'. A dive computer that runs the DSAT model, such as most Oceanics, would be happy with the profile but would show low NDL. And it would seemingly take forever if you were to try and get the computer back into the green zone during your ascent and stops.
I just threw the profile above quickly together looking at a standard RDP.
If you want, you can do the wheel calculations on my flat table equivalent
Full size: ScubaBoard Gallery - "Flattened Wheel"
How do you guys know all this stuff??? It sure isn't in any of my dive manuals....(OW and AOW). Is this something you learn as dive master, instructor, or technical training?
The M-value article has the deco model limits for many models including the DSAT model on which PADI RDP and wheel are based. The NDL article has the basic formula, which can easily but put into a spreadsheet. The time at each depth/PG spot on the PADI table is the NDL for a reduced limit associated for that pressure group. I already knew that PADI RDP pressure groups and repetitive dive calculations are based on the 60 minute compartment. I was able to figure out the ppN2 or fsw N2 assigned to each PG with a bit of playing around with a spreadsheet. The other parameter that I had to diddle with to get the numbers in the table to agree with PADI was the value for water vapor + CO2 in the lungs. It appears PADI uses a conservative 1.6fsw, a bit less than USN and Buhlmann which are about 2 fsw.
I just dug up an old spreadsheet and verified that the bottom edge of PG Z is reached when the 60 minute compartment is 95% of the full M-value. PG A and B are oddball values of 12% and 21% of M-value. From C through Z it goes from 21% to 95% in steps of 3%.
As you can see in the attached spreadsheet, the PADI RDP can be replicated using just a few formulas, repeated multiple times. The attached spreadsheet also does the simplistic calculation of multplying times * ata the generate "surface equivalent minutes" for easy gas planning. At an SAC of 0.5, the 65cfm of gas in an AL80 between 3000 and 500 psi will provide you with 65/0.5 = 130 surface equivalent minutes of air.
Well..... now I'm lost.![]()
Riding the NDL like the profile I posted will rack up N2 loading much faster than a square profile NDL dive, and for a given air supply, it results in the highest possible loading while always staying inside NDL.Yep, a multi level dive is essentially a series of "zero surface interval dives". My buddy used to work his tables that way, and we would compare notes at the end. Looks like a dive I wouldn't do.![]()
The key is to read Erik Baker, not me.I am sure that cleared everything right up for you.![]()