Red points out that the o-rings on the SPG spool (and also the second stage swivel), only seal when the regulator system is pressurized. When the regulator is soaked unpressurized, water enters at those two connections.
Which to my understanding would be relevant if I were asking about water inside my first stage. But I can’t figure out how that is relevant for how water got inside the face of my SPG. Your point is valid and accurate, but as far as I can tell not related to my question.
The only reason I’m replying and not simply skipping what seems to me to be an accurate but unrelated answer (you know, a typical ScubaBoard reply…
) is that I’m not 100% certain that the only reason you can get water in the gauge face is because of a case failure, and *not* a failure somewhere else.
Intuitively, that seems like it would be true. If there was a way for water to get into the gauge from the air pathway, there would be a way for *gas* to get into the gauge as well, which would at the very least bubble out, if not forcibly detach things like the glass face!
You mention pressurized versus unpressurized. That is a way where water could get into the gas pathway where it normally couldn’t, but I still don’t see how that gets water into the gauge face.
I mean, in my mind, you should be able to take an SPG completely disconnected from its hose down to 100 feet and not get water in the gauge face. You would certainly get water in the tube, but even then you shouldn’t get water in the face… And if that’s the case, then loose spools or bad O-rings or anything else aren’t relevant: they certainly aren’t creating a situation worse than no hose at all…. That is, if I’m right. And I’m not certain about that: just because I can’t imagine it doesn’t make it so!
Is there a way to get water into the gauge face through the air pathway? Alternatively, can it be accurately said that the only way to get water into the gauge face is through the case, and not through the air pathway? (I’m specifically excluding a situation where there is water in the air pathway and then the air pathway fails, pushing water into the gauge, because that would immediately be followed by gas being pushed into the gauge, which is not relevant here, nor in any of the other numerous failures of water in gauges I have seen.)
I’ll try to make myself sit down and watch that YouTube video. I just hate videos for instruction. A 28 minute video that except for the clickbait “horrors!“ shown, could be condensed into a page of text information that I can read in seconds — and easily search for and refer to in the future just as quickly.
Oh well. I’m old: get off my lawn.