Waivers for Clubs - How long can they be 'good' for?

Please register or login

Welcome to ScubaBoard, the world's largest scuba diving community. Registration is not required to read the forums, but we encourage you to join. Joining has its benefits and enables you to participate in the discussions.

Benefits of registering include

  • Ability to post and comment on topics and discussions.
  • A Free photo gallery to share your dive photos with the world.
  • You can make this box go away

Joining is quick and easy. Log in or Register now!

I've talked to a number of lawyers informally. I get the spectrum from 'you need to get a signed waiver every year' to 'that should be good enough'.

I deal with lawyers every day. For the past 25 years. My lawyers, my company's lawyers, my client's lawyers, the government's lawyers, etc, etc. I'd say easily more than 1,000 different lawyers over an insanely wide range of situations. The ONE thing all of my experiences with lawyers have in common is that I've never, ever, ever heard a lawyer say anything even remotely close to "that should be good enough." Ever. Even when asked to critique their own work-product they will still tell you all the additional things that could be done.

Were I your lawyer, I would advise you to get a new waiver per event. If I were a plaintiff's attorney I would start drooling if I heard you had a "once a year waiver." If I were your insurance company I would drop you like a hot potato.

Every dive/day/site/conditions vary. How can someone be expected to waive - or ask to have waived - in January, liability for a dive to an unknown site/depth/conditions/etc that might happen 1-to-11 months later. All you need is some schlub to die on a 100ft dive in November, and have his attorney point out that:

1.) The waiver was signed in January
2.) In January the schlub had never dived deeper than 60ft
3.) Even though the diver's experience may have grown significantly over the 11months, no one specifically pointed out to the schlub on the day of the deadly dive that the deadly dive varied greatly from the schlub's experience 11months earlier
4.) Accordingly, the schlub could not have possibly released liability, having lacked the requisite information upon which to make an informed decision to do so in 11 months earlier.

There's a dozen or more other things a plaintiff's attorney could add to his case. Did the club talk up this dive as being a big deal all year? Did anyone ever make fun of someone thumbing a dive? Do your members regularly compare numbers of logged dives? Do your members brag about who has done more dives? Deeper dives? All of that fosters an environment of peer pressure and duress. With a once-a-year waiver all of that stuff becomes cumulative, with the diver never really having a chance to decide to "opt out" of doing the dive. But, if you put a waiver in front of them before each event... you get the diver to reaffirm their release of liability with full understanding of the dive, the conditions, their skills, etc.

A lot easier to defend.

We get signed waivers from customers that come out two days in a row to the same wreck. We don't often run two trips in the same day, but if/when we do we'll have anyone who's joining us again in the afternoon sign another waiver... even if they never set foot off the boat when we went back to the dock for the second trip.

PS - I wouldn't take directions to a gas station from a lawyer who ever uttered the phrase "that should be good enough" relative to ANYTHING.
 
Another thing to consider is the laws in your state, and court cases which have involved waivers. For example, in some states, waivers for minors are rarely, if ever, enforced. Also, various states have language requirements for waivers in order for them to be deemed valid in court. I found a site that talks about waivers, and the likelyhood for enforcement in various states:

The ABCs of Liability Waivers -- Risk Management

Unfortunately, waivers won't protect you from getting sued. They will only protect your club from having to pay huge sums of money for damages (ideally). And they won't protect against gross negligence, reckless conduct, and stuff like that.

Bottom line is you need to figure out what the laws of your state are regarding liability waivers, as those laws may spell out how often a waiver needs to be renewed. Also, if you haven't reviewed your waiver for compliance with the regulations of your state, it would be a good idea to do so. A poorly written waiver can be as bad as no waiver at all.
 
I deal with lawyers every day. For the past 25 years. My lawyers, my company's lawyers, my client's lawyers, the government's lawyers, etc, etc. I'd say easily more than 1,000 different lawyers over an insanely wide range of situations. The ONE thing all of my experiences with lawyers have in common is that I've never, ever, ever heard a lawyer say anything even remotely close to "that should be good enough." Ever. Even when asked to critique their own work-product they will still tell you all the additional things that could be done.

Were I your lawyer, I would advise you to get a new waiver per event. If I were a plaintiff's attorney I would start drooling if I heard you had a "once a year waiver." If I were your insurance company I would drop you like a hot potato.

Every dive/day/site/conditions vary. How can someone be expected to waive - or ask to have waived - in January, liability for a dive to an unknown site/depth/conditions/etc that might happen 1-to-11 months later. All you need is some schlub to die on a 100ft dive in November, and have his attorney point out that:

1.) The waiver was signed in January
2.) In January the schlub had never dived deeper than 60ft
3.) Even though the diver's experience may have grown significantly over the 11months, no one specifically pointed out to the schlub on the day of the deadly dive that the deadly dive varied greatly from the schlub's experience 11months earlier
4.) Accordingly, the schlub could not have possibly released liability, having lacked the requisite information upon which to make an informed decision to do so in 11 months earlier.

There's a dozen or more other things a plaintiff's attorney could add to his case. Did the club talk up this dive as being a big deal all year? Did anyone ever make fun of someone thumbing a dive? Do your members regularly compare numbers of logged dives? Do your members brag about who has done more dives? Deeper dives? All of that fosters an environment of peer pressure and duress. With a once-a-year waiver all of that stuff becomes cumulative, with the diver never really having a chance to decide to "opt out" of doing the dive. But, if you put a waiver in front of them before each event... you get the diver to reaffirm their release of liability with full understanding of the dive, the conditions, their skills, etc.

A lot easier to defend.

We get signed waivers from customers that come out two days in a row to the same wreck. We don't often run two trips in the same day, but if/when we do we'll have anyone who's joining us again in the afternoon sign another waiver... even if they never set foot off the boat when we went back to the dock for the second trip.

PS - I wouldn't take directions to a gas station from a lawyer who ever uttered the phrase "that should be good enough" relative to ANYTHING.

Hello RJP,

I have dealt with a few lawyers over the years. Your post is right in line with the type of thought process they would use to answer the OP's question.

Also, my gut reaction to "that should be good enough" was the same as yours.

Great post, thanks,

markm
 

Back
Top Bottom